Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a set of statements about how food was perceived by soldiers, and we must evaluate each option.
Option 1: "According to masculine norms of the day soldiers were happy with any food". This claim oversimplifies beliefs about rationing and food preferences; it assumes a uniform, positive attitude toward all food that aligns with masculine norms, which is not a nuanced or universally supported interpretation of soldiers' experiences with rations. It also ignores context about deprivation or restrictions that often accompanied military life.
Option 2: "Good food was regarded as an unnecessary luxury by soldiers on active service". While scarcity and rationing occurred, characterizing good food as merely an unnecessary luxury is an overgeneralization. Some meals might have been valued for morale or comfort, and soldiers could perceive food as more than just fuel, especially under harsh conditions. This option reduces the meaning of food to utilitarian terms only.
Option 3: "Food was a reminder of civilian life and what the soldiers had left behind". This perspective ties food to memory and loss, highlighting how rations and limited access to familiar foods could foreground the soldiers’ connection to home and civilian life. It captures the emotional and psychological resonance of food beyond sustenance, making it a plausible and nuanced interpretation.
Option 4: "Food was purely a form of energy needed for fighting". This view limits food to physiological energy, ignoring its social, cultural, and emotional dimensions. It neglects how meals, taste, and shared eating experiences can carry meaning, morale, and identity for soldiers, rendering it an incomplete characterization.
In summary, option 3 emphasizes the symbolic and emotional role of food in maintaining ties to civilian life and the losses endured, while the other options either oversimplify, mischaracterize, or ignore important dimensions of how food functioned for soldiers. Acknowledging these subtleties helps distinguish the correct interpretation from the oversimplified alternatives.

UNIB10009_2025_SM1 Exam: Food for a Healthy Planet (UNIB10009_2025_SM1)

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What was surprising about the cost of constructing 5-Star homes?

What is stated in the first paragraph?

Which of the following statements best summarises the writer’s perspective on sustainable building practices?

According to the writer, what role does education play in solving the housing crisis?

What is the main point that paragraph 1 is making?

Which of the following best represents the authors’ recommendation?

In paragraph 3, the authors claim:

According to the text:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler