Question2 If Australia’s inflation = 3% and US inflation = 6%, then under relative PPP, the AUD should: Select one alternative: A) Appreciate ≈ 3% B) Depreciate ≈ 3% C) Appreciate ≈ 6% D) Remain unchanged ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, restating the problem helps set the context: If Australia’s inflation is 3% and the US inflation is 6%, then under relative purchasing power parity (PPP), the exchange rate between AUD and USD should adjust by the inflation differential.
Option A: 'Appreciate ≈ 3%.' This aligns with relative PPP, which states that if a country experiences lower inflation relative to another, its currency should appreciate by roughly the difference in inflation rates. Since US inflation is higher by 3 percentage points, the AUD is expected to strengthen against the USD by about 3%. This is a correct interpretation.
Option B: 'Depreciate ≈ 3%.’ This would imply the currency with lower inflation (AUD) would weaken by 3%, which contradicts the relative PPP implication. If the foreign country has higher inflation, its currency should lose value relative to the lower-inflation country, not the other way around.
Option C: 'Appreciate ≈ 6%.' This reflects the full US inflation rate rather than the differential. Relative PPP cares about the difference between the two inflation rates, not the entire rate of the other country, so 6% is too large and incorrect.
Option D: 'Remain unchanged.' Relative PPP generally predicts a move corresponding to the inflation differential unless there are offsetting factors; with a 3% differential, assuming other factors neutral, the exchange rate should adjust, so 'remains unchanged' is unlikely and not consistent with the PPP rule.
In summary, the key idea is that the exchange rate shift equals (inflation_US − inflation_Australia) when measuring how the AUD/USD rate should adjust; here that difference is 3%, indicating the AUD should appreciate by about 3% relative to the USD. The other options misstate the direction or the magnitude of the adjustment that PPP predicts.

Question2 If Australia’s inflation = 3% and US inflation = 6%, then under relative PPP, the AUD should: Select one alternative: A) Appreciate ≈ 3% B) Depreciate ≈ 3% C) Appreciate ≈ 6% D) Remain unchanged ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

The price of a Big Mac in the U.S. is $3.41 and the price in Mexico is Peso 29.0. What is the implied PPP of the Peso per dollar?

Assume the implied PPP rate of exchange of Mexican Pesos per U.S. dollar is 8.50 according to the Big Mac Index. Further, assume the current exchange rate is Peso 10.80/$1. Thus, according to PPP and the Law of One Price, at the current exchange rate the peso is:

________ states that differential rates of inflation between two countries tend to be offset over time by an equal but opposite change in the spot exchange rate.

Which of the following is NOT correct about the law of one price and the purchasing power parity (PPP) theory?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler