Why has China not really received a good public image in recent years?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's break down the question and each answer option to understand why public image concerns about China have persisted in recent years.
Option 1: 'The public sentiment towards China remains notably low with 53% of Australian expressing trust in China’s ability to act responsibility on the global stage.' This statement asserts a specific trust level (53%) and frames it as a notable low. While it could be plausible in a survey context, it requires a source. Without a cited survey, we cannot verify the exact percentage, so this option makes an assertion that depends on data. However, it does reflect a general trend of wavering trust, which some readers might recognize in public opinion data.
Option 2: '71% of Australians believe it is likely that China will pose a military threat to Australia within next 20 years.' This option presents a clear, specific minority/majority belief about strategic threats. If one accepts the premise that such a survey occurred and the figure is 71%, it directly ties public perception to a heightened security concern, which aligns with narratives about rising geopolitical tensions and public fear regarding military risk. This option specifically frames public image through security threat perception, a common contributor to a negative image.
Option 3: '17% of Australians believe that through China’s investments and ownership of major Australian corporations, China will make a sway to Australia’s economy in future.' This statement emphasizes economic influence via investments and ownership. While economic leverage is a component of public perception, the phrasing is specific about future sway and could be seen as plausible. However, it presents a narrower dimension (economic influence) rather than a broad public image issue and lacks context about whether 17% represents a significant or recognized concern in images of China.
Option 4: 'A total of 71% of Australians surveyed perceive China more as a security threat than an economic partner.' This option explicitly compares security threat versus economic partnership, suggesting a qualitative judgment about China’s role. It captures a broader image narrative, highlighting a shift toward threat perception relative to economic engagement. If such a survey exists, this would directly address why public image has been negative, given security framing dominates opinion.
Across the options, several common missteps appear. Some statements rely on specific percentages without citation, which weakens their evidentiary strength. Others frame China’s image through a single lens (security or economy) and may oversimplify a complex public perception that blends security, economic, political, and ethical considerations. Distinctions matter: a statement focusing solely on trust in China’s global responsibility (Option 1) might miss threat perceptions; a claim about future economic sway (Option 3) may underplay security concerns; and a comparison of threat vs. partnership (Option 4) encapsulates a broader image narrative that many analysts associate with recent public discourse.
If you weigh which option best accounts for the general question of why China hasn’t enjoyed a positive public image in recent years, you’d look for statements that express a clear perception of threat or negative impact relative to positive economic or diplomatic roles. Among the provided choices, Option 2 centers on a perception of military threat within a two-decade horizon, which is a strong driver of negative public image and aligns with widely discussed security concerns in public discourse. Option 4 similarly presents a threat-dominant perception, but it requires a direct survey comparison; without explicit confirmation of such a survey, Option 2 remains a straightforward expression of threat perception with a specific statistic. Options 1 and 3, while describing relevant perceptions, either lack corroborating data or present a narrower lens that doesn’t fully capture the public image issue as forcefully as threat-perception statements do.
In summary, the reasoning behind a negative public image of China often hinges on perceived security threats and rising geopolitical concerns, which is reflected in statements that emphasize threat levels and security-oriented judgments. The options that foreground threat perceptions (Option 2 and Option 4) align with that broader explanation, whereas those focusing mainly on trust (Option 1) or future economic sway (Option 3) provide a narrower or less directly explanatory framing of the public image issue.

MERGE_2025_0025 Quiz: How China Helped Build Australia's Economy

Why has China not really received a good public image in recent years?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 8 As discussed in class, strikes may be generally influenced by the court of public opinion.TrueFalse

Which of the following would most likely cause a shift in the Overton Window?

A recent Pew Research Center poll reported that ________ Blank percent of Americans believe their personal data are less secure now than they were five years ago.

Match the four terms, below with their definitions, as found in Chapter 6. 1: Stereotype 2: Geodesic Dome 3: Walter LIppmann 4: Buckminster Fuller

The majority of people think that dating apps have made it harder to find a long-term partner. NOTE: Majority of people refers to an average across all people - not a specific gender.

When surveyed, which profession was chosen by the general public as highest in honesty and ethics?

Most Americans do support science. This is because

Identify the bond angle and molecular shape of H2O.

More Practical Tools for International Students

Exam Browser Assistant

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler