To make a case of wrongful discharge based on promissory estoppel, a former employee must show:

BlackTom题目解析

Question

To make a case of wrongful discharge based on promissory estoppel, a former employee must show:

BlackTom题目解析

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's break down the elements of promissory estoppel in the wrongful discharge context and evaluate each choice.
Option 1: 'the employer failed to promise the employee something that they anticipated.' This is vague about what was promised and doesn’t address reliance or detriment; promissory estoppel requires a promise that is reasonably relied upon, not merely anticipation of a promise.
Option 2: 'the employee is reasonably expected to rely on the promise.' Reasonable reliance is a key component, but on its own it is not enough; promissory estoppel also requires that the reliance be to the employee's detriment and that a promise was actually made or intended to be binding.
Option 3: 'the employee is harmed by reliance on the promise.' Harm or detriment due to reliance is essential, yet this option mentions harm in abstract without tying it to a promissory promise and its existence; promissory estoppel requires the promise and the resulting detriment from reliance, not harm alone.
Option 4: 'the former employee relied on that promise to their detriment.' This option combines three crucial pieces: there was a promise, the employee relied on it, and the reliance caused detriment. This aligns with the core doctrine of promissory estoppel in the wrongful discharge setting.
Option 5: 'a promise from the employer or that an authorized representative made a promise.' While establishing that a promise existed and was made by an authorized source is important, this option alone does not mention reliance or detriment, which are also required elements for promissory estoppel.
By evaluating the elements required—existence of a promise, reasonable reliance, and detriment due to reliance—the statement that best captures all essential aspects is the one describing reliance to the employee’s detriment resulting from the promise. This integrates the causal chain from promise to detrimental reliance and aligns with promissory estoppel doctrine in employment contexts.

To make a case of wrongful discharge based on promissory estoppel, a former employee must show: BlackTom题目解析

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Which one of the following is NOT true?

Jens owes JC Builders $5000. On discovering that JC Builders are in financial difficulty Jens offers to pay them $3,000 in full settlement of the debt. JC Builders agree to accept the $3,000 but a week later, claim the remaining $2,000. Will JC Builders succeed in their claim?

More Practical Tools for International Students

Exam Browser Assistant

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler