Which of the following was a reason for the RE-AIM framework to be developed?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks which of the following was a reason for developing the RE-AIM framework, a framework used in public health.
Option a: 'Tightly control intervention implementation' — This is not aligned with RE-AIM, which emphasizes real-world applicability and broad evaluation across multiple dimensions rather than strict control of how interventions are implemented. The framework seeks to understand how interventions perform in real settings, not to impose tight control.
Option b: 'Improve the planning and evaluation of public health interventions' — This accurately reflects the purpose behind RE-AIM: to guide planning, implementation, and evaluation to ensure interventions are effective, scalable, and applicable in real-world public health contexts. It focuses on planning for impact across multiple domains and measuring outcomes accordingly.
Option c: 'Improve the reporting of clinical trials' — While reporting is important, this is more the domain of CONSORT and related reporting guidelines for clinical trials, not the impetus for RE-AIM development.
Option d: 'Evaluate the clinical effectiveness of interventions' — Although effectiveness is one dimension within RE-AIM (the 'E' for Effectiveness), the reason for the framework’s development was broader, aiming to plan and evaluate public health interventions in real-world settings across multiple dimensions (reach, adoption, implementation, maintenance) rather than focusing solely on clinical effectiveness.
In sum, the most accurate reason among the options is that RE-AIM was developed to improve the planning and evaluation of public health interventions, capturing multiple facets of real-world impact rather than focusing on narrow aspects like strict control, trial reporting, or only clinical effectiveness.

Dashboard Quiz #3

Which of the following was a reason for the RE-AIM framework to be developed?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which framework is primarily used to comprehensively evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program?

If an intervention fails to produce the expected results, but the process evaluation shows that it was delivered as planned, this suggests:

The dental hygienist's role in public health in evaluating program via index and community evaluations is:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler