Which framework is primarily used to comprehensively evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When choosing a framework to evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program, it helps to consider what each framework emphasizes.
Option 1: RE-AIM. This framework explicitly targets public health impact by examining five dimensions—Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance—allowing a comprehensive assessment of how well an intervention works in real-world settings and its sustainability. It is widely used for evaluating public health programs end-to-end.
Option 2: CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research). CFIR is a robust framework for understanding implementation processes and contextual factors that influence whether an intervention is adopted and how well it is implemented, but it focuses more on the implementation process itself rather than directly measuring population-level public health impact outcomes across spaces and time.
Option 3: EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment). EPIS provides a lifecycle perspective on implementation phases, emphasizing temporal stages and the fit between contexts and interventions, but like CFIR, its primary strength is the implementation journey rather than a structured, multi-outcome public health impact assessment.
Option 4: ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Interventions). ERIC is a compilation of implementation strategies and expert recommendations to facilitate uptake, rather than a framework that organizes and interprets impact dimensions across reach, effectiveness, adoption, maintenance, and so forth.
Therefore, the framework that most directly targets and integrates the public health impact across multiple outcomes and settings is the one that explicitly names the impact dimensions in its structure (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance), guiding comprehensive evaluation across the program’s lifespan.

KNHES 4525 AU2025 (11047) Exam 2

Which framework is primarily used to comprehensively evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

If an intervention fails to produce the expected results, but the process evaluation shows that it was delivered as planned, this suggests:

The dental hygienist's role in public health in evaluating program via index and community evaluations is:

Which of the following was a reason for the RE-AIM framework to be developed?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler