Question at position 12 In the P.E.R.I.E. process for evidence-based public health, which of the following is an example of "evaluation" and what it is focused on?Adapting an intervention for promoting prostate cancer awareness to be used instead for COVID-19 awarenessAssessing the number of cases in a recent disease outbreakDetermining if an intervention offering free beer from a local brewpub for people who received a COVID-19 vaccine helped increase COVID-19 vaccine uptakeDetermining the potential cause of a new mysterious illness

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks us to identify which option represents an example of 'evaluation' within the P.E.R.I.E. process for evidence-based public health, and what it is focused on.
Option 1: 'Adapting an intervention for promoting prostate cancer awareness to be used instead for COVID-19 awareness.' This describes modifying an intervention for a different context, which is about adaptation or translation of an intervention, not about evaluating its impact or effectiveness.
Option 2: 'Assessing the number of cases in a recent disease outbreak.' This activity is about surveillance or situational monitoring, counting cases to describe the current situation, rather than evaluating whether an intervention works.
Option 3: 'Determining if an intervention offering free beer from a local brewpub for people who received a COVID-19 vaccine helped increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake.' This statement focuses on assessing the effect of an intervention on an outcome (vaccine uptake), which is the core of evaluation—judging whether the intervention achieved its intended impact.
Option 4: 'Determining the potential cause of a new mysterious illness.' This is an etiologic investigation aimed at identifying causes of disease, not evaluating an intervention's effectiveness.

In summary, the evaluation type centers on measuring whether an intervention produces the desired effects; options 1, 2, and 4 relate to adaptation, surveillance, and etiologic inquiry respectively, while option 3 explicitly examines the intervention's impact on a health outcome and thus aligns with evaluation.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which framework is primarily used to comprehensively evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program?

If an intervention fails to produce the expected results, but the process evaluation shows that it was delivered as planned, this suggests:

The dental hygienist's role in public health in evaluating program via index and community evaluations is:

Which of the following was a reason for the RE-AIM framework to be developed?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler