Consider a bargaining situation with two suppliers (S1, S2) and two buyers (B1, B2). B1 and B2 have the following WTP structure: $1 for the product produced by S1 and $1.5 for the product made by S2. This is a case of

Question

Consider a bargaining situation with two suppliers (S1, S2) and two buyers (B1, B2).  B1 and B2 have the following WTP structure: $1 for the product produced by S1 and $1.5 for the product made by S2. This is a case of

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze the question, let's first restate the setup: two suppliers (S1 and S2) and two buyers (B1 and B2). Both buyers have WTP of $1 for the product from S1 and $1.5 for the product from S2. This implies that S2’s product is consistently valued higher by both buyers, regardless of which buyer is considering the purchase.
Option 1: weak differentiation. This term is not the standard way to categorize the difference between products in a market. Even if the degree of substitutability or perceived differences were small, the key feature here is that one product is valued higher by all buyers, which is not captured by simply labeling it as "weak." The scenario points to a uniform higher valuation for one product, not a merely weak or negligible difference.
Option 2: strong differentiation. While the concept of strong differentiation suggests substantial differences that reduce substitutability, the core observable is the existence of a universal higher WTP for S2’s product across buyers. However, the critical structural implication in this setup is the existence of a vertical ranking in quality and value, rather than just stating there is a strong difference. This option is not the most precise classification of the underlying differentiation.
Option 3: horizontal differentiation. Horizontal differentiation refers to differences across products along non-tungible attributes where different consumers prefer different options, and there is no universal ranking of quality. In this case, both buyers value S2’s product more ($1.5 vs $1 for S1) regardless of individual preferences, indicating a clear quality-based ranking rather than a taste-based diversification. Therefore, horizontal differentiation is incorrect.
Option 4: vertical differentiation. This is the standard classification when products differ in quality, and all consumers value the higher-quality option more than the lower-quality one. Since both B1 and B2 assign a higher WTP ($1.5) to the product from S2 and a lower WTP ($1) to the product from S1, the products are vertically differentiated by quality, creating a monotone upgrade in value across all buyers.
In summary, the data show a universal higher valuation for S2’s product, consistent with vertical differentiation, while the other labels fail to capture the same uniform quality-based ranking across buyers.

Consider a bargaining situation with two suppliers (S1, S2) and two buyers (B1, B2). B1 and B2 have the following WTP structure: $1 for the product produced by S1 and $1.5 for the product made by S2. This is a case of

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What does the word 'differentiated' mean in relation to products?

Monopolistic competitors in the food industry will often include a recyclable symbol on packaging used for their product as a means to

In monopolistic competition, the products of different sellers are assumed to be

Product differentiation refers to the?

Product differentiation refers to

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler