When a government sets a price floor, what is the expected outcome?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the outcome when a government sets a price floor. 
Option 1: 'There is no effect on the market.' This is misleading because a price floor, when set above the equilibrium price, prevents the market from reaching the natural equilibrium, creating distortions. Thus, this choice is incorrect.
Option 2: 'Price will always fall.' In reality, a price floor acts as a minimum price and, if above the equilibrium, will keep prices from falling to market-clearing levels. Therefore, this statement is false in typical scenarios where the floor is binding.
Option 3: 'A surplus occurs if the floor is above equilibrium.' This accurately describes the classic result: setting a floor above the equilibrium price leads to quantity supplied exceeding quantity demanded, creating a surplus. This option is correct.
Option 4: 'A shortage occurs at all times.' A price floor above equilibrium does not cause a shortage; a shortage is associated with price ceilings below equilibrium. Hence this option is incorrect.

When a government sets a price floor, what is the expected outcome?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Figure 6-4 Graph (a) Graph (b) Refer to Figure 6-4. In graph (b), there will be

A price floor is

22. The price floor ( min price) creates excess supply (surplus)

If a price floor at P4 is set to help farmers in terms of income and government wants to assure farmers that their output will be purchased, the government would have to purchase an amount of output equal to:

Which of the following would increase quantity supplied, decrease quantity demanded, and increase the price that consumers pay?

When the government imposes a binding price floor, it causes