Price discrimination is always legal in the United States.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The statement presented is 'Price discrimination is always legal in the United States.' We will evaluate each answer option for accuracy and provide reasoning accordingly.
Option 1: 'True' — This option claims that price discrimination is always legal. In reality, price discrimination is not universally legal in the U.S. because certain forms can violate antitrust and consumer protection laws. For example, under the Robinson-Patman Act, sellers with a specified market power may be prohibited from charging different prices to different buyers if the effect is to lessen competition or to create an unfair bias in the market. Additionally, price discrimination can be illegal if it harms competition, involves predatory pricing, or is intended to exploit a specific customer segment in ways that violate substantive antitrust principles. Therefore, the blanket assertion of legality is incorrect, and this option misstates the scope of the law.
Option 2: 'False' — This statement asserts that price discrimination is not always legal. This aligns with the general understanding of U.S. antitrust and competition law: while some price discrimination is allowed or even common in certain contexts (e.g., volume discounts, promotional pricing, or segment-specific pricing that does not minimize competition), other forms can be illegal if they harm competition or are aimed at disadvantaging competitors or specific customers in a way that violates statutes such as the Robinson-Patman Act or other antitrust provisions. This nuanced view explains why price discrimination is not universally legal and why legality depends on factors like intent, market power, and competitive impact. The distinction emphasizes that legality is context-dependent rather than absolute.
Rationale summary: The core misconception in option 1 is treating price discrimination as universally permissible, overlooking statutory constraints and procompetitive justifications that permit certain pricing practices. The nuance in option 2 reflects the legal landscape where some price discrimination is lawful under narrowly defined circumstances, while other forms are regulated or prohibited to maintain fair competition.
Additional considerations: When evaluating price discrimination, factors such as the seller’s market power, the structure of the relevant market, the potential anti-competitive effects, and the presence of legitimate business justifications (e.g., cost-based pricing, efficiency gains, or compliance with regulatory requirements) all influence legality. This layered view helps prevent overgeneralization and clarifies how policy and law distinguish permissible pricing from unlawful discrimination.

Price discrimination is always legal in the United States.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following terms describes a firm's actions when it sells the same product to different resellers at different prices?

Who usually benefits from price discrimination?

Selling the same goods to different targeted groups at different prices is called:

Price discrimination is

Assume that a profit-maximizing monopoly is charging a single price. If the monopoly can price discriminate and charge each consumer what he or she is willing to pay, which of the following will occur?

Price discrimination is not practiced very often in the US economy.

Baseball ticket sellers charge a different price for adults and children. Ballpark concession stands charge the same prices for products sold to any customer. The baseball ticket sellers are providing a successful example of

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler