Why do Jo and Cam believe the precautionary principle might prevent innovation?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Why do Jo and Cam believe the precautionary principle might prevent innovation?

Option A: It costs too much. This answer focuses on economic cost as a barrier. While expensive initiatives can impede experimentation, the precautionary principle is typically discussed in terms of risk and the burden of proof rather than cost alone. So costliness is not the core rationale used to argue it might hamper innovation in this context.

Option B: It lacks a scientific basis. This option points to a foundational critique of the precautionary principle: if the principle is invoked without solid scientific certainty, it can stall new ideas by demanding proof before any action. This aligns with common criticisms that precautionary reasoning may hinder progress when evidence is uncertain or incomplete, thereby potentially slowing innovative efforts.

Option C: It doesn’t provide advantages. This statement asserts there are no benefits to the precautionary principle. In debates about risk management, proponents argue that it offers advantages like protecting public health or the environment by preventing harmful experiments. Dismissing all benefits overlooks these intended protective aims, making this option overly absolute and not usually supported in nuanced discussions.

Summary analysis: A is about cost and is a tangential critique rather than the central argument linked to innovation suppression via precautionary reasoning. B directly addresses the concern that the precautionary principle could impede innovative activity due to demands for robust scientific justification before proceeding. C denies any benefits, which conflicts with arguments that the principle seeks to avoid irreversible harm, even if those arguments are contested. The reasoning behind the belief that precautionary approaches might hinder innovation most closely corresponds to the lack of a solid scientific basis for triggering precautionary limits and thus slowing novel ventures, which is captured by option B.

Why do Jo and Cam believe the precautionary principle might prevent innovation?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Why does Cam discuss the movie Erin Brokovitch?

Why does Cam discuss the movie Erin Brokovitch?

The lecturer is careful to point out that the precautionary principle

In the 1970s, the German government imposed restrictions on power plants

Why does Cam discuss the movie Erin Brokovitch?

What did Cam understand from this lecture?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler