True or False: Guzmán states that in times of intense polarization, it’s sometimes better to sever ties with people whose views differ so drastically.
True

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Consider the statement being evaluated: Guzmán states that in times of intense polarization, it’s sometimes better to sever ties with people whose views differ so drastically.
Option 1: 'True' — This would assert that cutting off ties is sometimes a recommended response to severe polarization. To evaluate, we need to recall Guzmán’s perspective on dialogue, relationship maintenance, and the ethical or practical implications of social separation. If Guzmán argues for engagement, open dialogue, or coalition-building despite disagreements, then this option would be inconsistent. On the other hand, if he argues that severing ties can be justified in extreme cases to protect well-being or reduce harm, then this option could be seen as aligned with his stance. Without invoking the exact context, this option hinges on whether the author endorses disengagement in polarized times or not.
Option 2: 'False' — Selecting this would mean Guzmán does not endorse severing ties as a strategy during intense polarization, implying he favors continued interaction, dialogue, or finding common ground despite differences. If Guzmán emphasizes the value of listening, understanding opposing viewpoints, or maintaining relationships to promote long-term reconciliation, then this option coherently reflects that stance. It would be inconsistent with a position that promotes avoidance or cutting off communication.
Option 3: '' (empty) — An empty option provides no substantive claim to evaluate. It should be disregarded in reasoning because it does not express a proposition about Guzmán’s view. Treating it as a non-option avoids fabricating an interpretation where none exists.
Option 4: '' (empty) — Similarly, another blank option adds no content to assess and should be ignored in the analysis for the same reasons as Option 3.
Key distinctions to focus on: If the author advocates for maintaining dialogue and relationships across political divides, the statement asserting severing ties would be misleading. If the author instead argues that safety, harm reduction, or ethical boundaries justify disengagement, that would support the 'True' stance. In most discussions of polarization that emphasize constructive interaction and bridging gaps, the default assumption is toward engagement rather than automatic severance. Therefore, understanding Guzmán’s broader stance on discourse and relationship management is crucial to adjudicate which side aligns with his argument.
Note: The empty options do not contribute meaningfully to the question and do not require separate justification beyond recognizing their lack of content.
Overall, the strongest evaluative path is comparing the claim about severing ties to Guzmán’s advocated method for handling polarization: engagement and dialogue generally, rather than wholesale disconnection, unless specified otherwise.

Community Citizenship Initiative 2025 (Graduate Students - Morningside) Quiz: How to Have Difficult Conversations

True or False: Guzmán states that in times of intense polarization, it’s sometimes better to sever ties with people whose views differ so drastically. True

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In the answer box, write the vocabulary term that matches the definition below: "The presence of increasingly conflicting and divided viewpoints between the Democratic and Republican parties."

Ellger (2024) considers two types of polarization: [Fill in the blank], polarization and [Fill in the blank], polarization.

Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) argue that not all ideological dimensions are equally important. Figures 3-5 show variation of polarization on three dimensions over time. On which dimension is the party system polarization the weakest? (hint: compare the three figures and read p. 9 carefully)

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler