Which of the following best describes a challenge in cross-ideological dialogue that Mounk and Guzmán name?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To approach this question, we begin by considering the core idea attributed to Mounk and Guzmán about cross-ideological dialogue, which centers on trust and the perception of motives in differing viewpoints.
Option 1: 'People often assume those with different views are acting in bad faith.' This aligns with their discussion of a challenge in dialogue across ideologies, where interlocutors frequently suspect ill intent rather than engaging charitably.
Option 2: 'The only way to talk across divides is to avoid controversial topics.' While some strategies suggest steering away from inflammatory issues, Mounk and Guzmán emphasize more about underlying trust and presumptions rather than prescribing avoidance as the sole method.
Option 3: 'Most people refuse to engage in any disagreement at all.' This overstates a general behavior; the authors describe a barrier or tendency in dialogue, not a universal or absolute refusal to disagree.
Option 4: 'It is impossible to build trust once differences are known.' This claim is too strong and contradicts the idea of finding ways to navigate disagreements; the authors discuss challenges but do not assert impossibility of building trust once differences are acknowledged.

In summary, option 1 correctly captures the identified challenge—the assumption of bad faith when views differ—while the other options either misstate the central issue, overgeneralize, or offer an overly drastic conclusion that does not reflect the nuance of cross-ideological dialogue presented by Mounk and Guzmán.

Community Citizenship Initiative 2025 (Graduate Students - Morningside) Quiz: How to Have Difficult Conversations

Which of the following best describes a challenge in cross-ideological dialogue that Mounk and Guzmán name?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Why do polarized societies create structural openings for authoritarian leaders?

Affective polarization refers to

Dassonneville and Çakır's (2021) conclusion about polarization and turnout is that when polarization increases, centrist voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized , while extreme voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized by parties with extreme positions.

Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) find a [choice] relationship between levels of polarization and the extent to which electorates are partisan. (hint: read p. 15)

The redistricting explanation argues that constituencies are increasingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous . The sorting argument thinks that they are increaingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous .

Political parties play a role in increasing polarization through:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler