Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) find a [choice] relationship between levels of polarization and the extent to which electorates are partisan.

(hint: read p. 15)

Question

Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) find a [choice] relationship between levels of polarization and the extent to which electorates are partisan.

(hint: read p. 15)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the relationship that Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) find between levels of polarization and the extent to which electorates are partisan, noting to read page 15 for context.

In this item, the provided answer is a single term: "positive". Since the answer options are not listed in the prompt (the answer_options field is empty), there are no alternative choices to evaluate against the target statement.

To reason about the statement itself: a positive relationship would mean that higher levels of polarization are associated with a greater degree of partisanship among the electorate. If the authors indeed report a positive association on page 15, this supports the idea that as polarization increases, partisan motivations or allegiance intensify as well.

Without alternative options to contrast, we can still reflect on why a positive relationship makes sense conceptually: polarization often involves stronger in-group vs. out-group distinctions, more extreme attitudes, and less cross-cutting or moderating behavior, all of which can amplify partisan identities among voters. Conversely, a non-positive or negative relationship would suggest that polarization does not align with stronger partisanship or might even reduce it, which would require different theoretical backing and evidence.

Given the prompt and the supplied answer, the intended fill for the [choice] is "positive". If more options were present, we would compare each one to the claim, arguing for how it aligns or conflicts with the study’s findings and the textual support on page 15.

2261 PS 1361 SEC1000 Week 9: Party System Polarization

Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) find a [choice] relationship between levels of polarization and the extent to which electorates are partisan. (hint: read p. 15)

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following best describes a challenge in cross-ideological dialogue that Mounk and Guzmán name?

Why do polarized societies create structural openings for authoritarian leaders?

Affective polarization refers to

Dassonneville and Çakır's (2021) conclusion about polarization and turnout is that when polarization increases, centrist voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized , while extreme voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized by parties with extreme positions.

The redistricting explanation argues that constituencies are increasingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous . The sorting argument thinks that they are increaingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous .

Political parties play a role in increasing polarization through:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler