What was the most commonly given reason for conducting a stop by the NYPD during the height of stop and frisks?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the most commonly given reason for conducting a stop by the NYPD during the height of stop and frisk. 
First, note that the data provided includes an answer option listed as: 'the person had suspicious movements.' However, no additional answer choices are supplied for comparison, which limits the ability to analyze alternatives.
Option given: 'the person had suspicious movements.' In typical stop and frisk discussions, investigators often cited observable behaviors or suspicious indicators as grounds for stopping a person. The phrase 'suspicious movements' suggests behavior-based suspicion, which aligns with common narratives about the policy's rationale centered on observable conduct rather than inferred characteristics. From this, one can reason that if the question’s expected correct choice emphasizes observable behavior, then this option would be plausible as a frequently cited reason.
Because there are no other options to evaluate, we cannot contrast 'suspicious movements' with other possible grounds such as 'matching a suspect description,' 'suspicious appearance,' or 'encounter in a high-crime area.' Without those alternatives, we cannot identify which among them would be deemed most common.
In this situation, the analysis must acknowledge the limitation: the absence of the full set of answer choices prevents a comprehensive comparison. If you obtain the complete list of options, we can re-express each choice, weigh how often it was cited, and determine which one was most commonly reported, with reasoning for why the top option fits the historical pattern of stop-and-frisk justifications.
Additionally, consider that questions about stop and frisk motivations often involve policy debates, legal interpretations, and data from NYPD reports; thus, the phrasing of options can influence which reason appears most frequently in official narratives versus public discourse. When evaluating options, distinguish between behavior-based justifications (e.g., suspicious movements) and demographic or profiling claims, which are generally disfavored in legitimate analyses.
In summary, with the single provided option, the reasoning supports that behavior-based indicators like 'suspicious movements' could be a common justification, but a full assessment requires the complete set of answer choices to compare frequencies and determine the unequivocal most common reason.

psyc_468_120251_243897 Week 8 Quiz

What was the most commonly given reason for conducting a stop by the NYPD during the height of stop and frisks?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler