What is one danger of the hybrid role played by platforms like Airbnb and Uber?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Exploring the question about the dangers associated with the hybrid platforms like Airbnb and Uber requires evaluating how each option aligns with real-world regulatory and policy concerns.
Option 1: 'They cannot attract private investment' This claim is not accurate in general. In fact, these platforms often attract substantial private investment and venture capital, sometimes more readily than traditional incumbents, because investors respond to scalable, asset-light models. The statement mischaracterizes financial dynamics and therefore is not describing a primary danger of the hybrid model.
Option 2: 'They promote state ownership of all digital infrastructure' There is no widespread movement or evidence that these platforms push for state ownership of digital infrastructure. Their model is predominantly private-sector, platform-based, and does not inherently advocate for full public ownership of digital assets. This option misreads the typical relationship between platforms and state control.
Option 3: 'They blur regulatory categories and escape sector-specific regulation' This option points to a well-documented risk: platform-based hybrids often operate across traditional industry boundaries (e.g., hospitality, transportation) and leverage gig economy arrangements that can complicate which regulations apply (safety, labor, tax, zoning, licensing). By reclassifying workers as independent contractors and treating assets as on-demand services, they can sidestep or reinterpret sector-specific rules, creating regulatory gaps and uneven enforcement. This is a central danger identified by scholars and policymakers when considering hybrid platforms.
Option 4: 'They are too dependent on nonprofit funding models' This is generally not a defining trait of Airbnb or Uber and does not reflect the typical funding or business model of these platforms, which rely on private investment, venture funding, and for-profit operations rather than a heavy emphasis on nonprofit funding. This makes this option an inaccurate characterization of the danger associated with their hybrid role.
Overall, the most accurate danger highlighted by policy discussions is the ability of these platforms to blur regulatory categories and escape sector-specific regulation, leading to regulatory uncertainty and potential gaps in protections for workers, consumers, and public interests.

ARIN2610 (ND) Week 05 Quiz

What is one danger of the hybrid role played by platforms like Airbnb and Uber?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

How do platforms like Uber frame their services to avoid regulation?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler