For which of the following planetary boundaries have no quantitative indicators been presented yet?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To approach this question, we start by recalling the set of planetary boundaries and what each option refers to. 
Option a: Ocean acidification. This boundary has well-established quantitative indicators, such as the global mean pH of seawater and aragonite saturation state, with proposed safe operating ranges defined by the science. The presence of concrete indicators here makes this option align with boundaries that have measurable metrics. 
Option b: Chemicalisation of the environment. This boundary is described in some planetary boundary frameworks as concerning the pervasive increase in chemical pollutants and synthetic substances. Historically, this boundary has faced challenges in defining a single, globally accepted quantitative indicator or endpoint, due to the vast diversity of chemicals and exposure pathways, as well as data gaps and varying regional contexts. As a result, a universal quantitative indicator has not been established or agreed upon for this boundary. 
Option c: Changes in land use. Land-use change is tracked with quantitative measures such as deforestation rates, urbanization extent, and changes in soil carbon stocks. These metrics are well-defined and monitored, providing clear indicators for the boundary. 
Option d: Climate change. The climate boundary is among the most quantified, with indicators like global mean surface temperature increase, radiative forcing, and atmospheric CO2 concentrations, all accompanied by defined thresholds and trajectories. 
In summary, options a, c, and d have established quantitative indicators or well-defined metrics within planetary boundary discussions, whereas option b—Chemicalisation of the environment—lacks a universally agreed, single quantitative indicator and is characterized by data gaps and heterogeneity across chemicals and regions. The absence of a standardized quantitative metric for this boundary distinguishes it from the others.

For which of the following planetary boundaries have no quantitative indicators been presented yet?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to the Stockholm Resilience Centre, how many of the nine planetary boundaries have already been crossed as a result of human activity?

According to the Stockholm Resilience Centre, how many of the nine planetary boundaries have already been crossed as a result of human activity?

The term planetary boundaries was explained in Rockstrom et al (2009) as...

For which of the following planetary boundaries has the threshold of acceptable risk been transgressed?