Which TWO of the following actions could Sophie have taken instead? (Select the two answers that apply)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which two actions Sophie could have taken instead. 
Option 1: Put quotation marks around her entire essay and included a reference to her first essay before submitting it.
This option suggests heavy quoting of the entire essay and adding a reference. In academic work, simply quoting an entire essay and citing a previous piece would raise concerns about originality, self-plagiarism, and proper quoting practices. It does not align with typical guidelines for developing original work or appropriately integrating sources, so this choice is not a suitable alternative.

Option 2: Selected a different topic to write about to develop her knowledge of the Australian legal system.
Choosing a different topic to explore can be a constructive way to deepen understanding and demonstrate learning growth, especially if the new topic still aligns with the assignment’s aims and broadens her knowledge of the subject area. This is a reasonable, permissible action that fits the idea of “could have taken,” making it a valid choice.

Option 3: Tried harder to rewrite her first essay so it didn’t look the same the second time she submitted it.
While revising to improve originality is common, simply rewriting to avoid similarity without changing underlying ideas or intent can still amount to self-plagiarism or insufficient originality, depending on the assignment rules. If the task required new insights or a different approach, this option could still be problematic. Given the prompt’s expected correct answers, this option is not the best example of a valid alternative.

Option 4: Talked to her social studies teacher about how she could build on the ideas she wrote about in her first essay.
Engaging with a teacher to discuss feedback and ways to extend or develop ideas is a constructive, collaborative approach that supports learning and demonstrates initiative. This aligns well with pedagogical guidance for improving work, making it a valid and appropriate action.

In summary, the two actions that could have been taken are those that promote genuine development of knowledge (option 2) and proactive guidance-seeking to improve or expand on ideas (option 4). The other options either risk issues with originality and integrity (option 1) or present a less clear or potentially inappropriate approach to revision (option 3).

2025_UNIV_AHEM Module 2 Scenario: Same, same but different

Which TWO of the following actions could Sophie have taken instead? (Select the two answers that apply)

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I should cite correctly and paraphrase to avoid plagiarism.

Forgetting to include quotation marks/ credit the source is plagiarism.

Which of the following is not a way to fix Swiss cheese plagiarism?

What is Swiss cheese plagiarism according to Professor Stevenson?

Plagiarism can sometimes be unintentional. What other behaviour would count as plagiarism? Please select all that apply

彼得可能被指控犯了什么罪？

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler