Why is science correlated with systematicity, according to Bird?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restated: Why is science correlated with systematicity, according to Bird?
Option A: 'Science is not necessarily correlated with systematicity, but as it happened to develop, it did become more systematic.' This claim suggests no inherent link between science and systematicity, and posits that systematicity is a historical accident. It contradicts Bird’s emphasis on a deliberate, structured approach as central to science, so it is not aligned with Bird's position.
Option B: 'Because science is something that is performed by large communities of scientists, and communication between them requires systematicity.' While collaboration and communication are important in science, this answer centers on social processes rather than on Bird’s core explanation about the methodological character of science. It explains a social motivation for systematicity, not the principled link Bird emphasizes between the nature of scientific inquiry and systematic methods.
Option C: 'Bird follows Aristotle's approach to science, according to which it is a systematic and empirical investigation of the natural world.' This option aligns with Bird’s claim that science is anchored in a systematic, empirical methodology akin to Aristotelian tradition, where careful observation, categorization, and methodical reasoning structure inquiry. It directly captures Bird’s rationale for the correlation between science and systematicity.
Option D: 'Because the propositions of science are such that they cannot be confirmed or disconfirmed through the use of our ordinary cognitive capacities.' This statement undercuts the role of systematic methods by appealing to limits of ordinary cognition, which is not what Bird argues regarding the linkage between science and systematicity. It misstates the source of systematicity by focusing on cognitive limitations rather than methodological structure.
In summary, the reasoning supports Option C as the one that accurately reflects Bird’s view, while Options A, B, and D present interpretations that either downplay or misstate the methodological connection Bird attributes to science. The core distinction rests on whether one emphasizes Aristotelian, systematic empirical methodology (Option C) versus broader social or skeptical positions (Options A, B, D).

2261 HPS 0612 SEC1030 Exam 2 Lecture Portion - Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Why is science correlated with systematicity, according to Bird?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 41 Karl PopperThomas KuhnDavid HumeJohn LockeMaryam Jameelah

位置1的问题 A way in which scientific questions are different than philosophical ones is that the scientific questions involve more conceptual analysis and require more than observation and experimentation for their solution.FalseTrue

According to Laplace et al., which of the following are ways in which the conceptual clarification of scientific terms provided by philosophers can improve science? (Check BOTH that apply)

Science as a “way of knowing” differs from art, religion, and philosophy in that

The Cuttler reading states the postmodernist-inductive method is the primary way scientific researchers use theories.

Jaggar argues that it is possible for scientists to cast aside their emotions and value judgments, and to perform their work completely dispassionately.

In this essay, Harding defends the claim that modern science is culturally-neutral, and does not have any trace of Western culture in it.

小说《三体》中“科学边界”组织致力于探讨的主要学术问题是：

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler