位置1的问题 A way in which scientific questions are different than philosophical ones is that the scientific questions involve more conceptual analysis and require more than observation and experimentation for their solution.FalseTrue

Question

位置1的问题 A way in which scientific questions are different than philosophical ones is that the scientific questions involve more conceptual analysis and require more than observation and experimentation for their solution.FalseTrue

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: 位置1的问题 A way in which scientific questions are different than philosophical ones is that the scientific questions involve more conceptual analysis and require more than observation and experimentation for their solution. False True

Option 1: False. This option suggests that the statement is not accurate. The claim asserts that scientific questions require more conceptual analysis and more than observation and experimentation, which is not typically how science distinguishes itself from philosophy. In science, empirical methods, testable hypotheses, and repeatable experiments are central, so claiming that science relies more on conceptual analysis alone without emphasis on observation and experimentation mischaracterizes scientific practice. The nuance here is that science integrates empirical data with conceptual reasoning, not that empirical work is absent.

Option 2: True. This option would affirm the statement as written, claiming that scientific questions require more conceptual analysis and more than observation and experimentation. The issue with this stance is that it overstates the role of conceptual analysis in science and underplays the essential role of observation and experimentation. In many scientific investigations, empirical measurement, data collection, and controlled experimentation are foundational steps that drive conclusions, hypotheses, and theory development. While philosophical inquiry may emphasize conceptual analysis, many scientific questions do rely heavily on empirical methods to test ideas and to refine concepts.

Summary consideration: The key misconception in Option 2 is the implication that science de-emphasizes observation and experimentation in favor of pure conceptual analysis, which contradicts the core methodological emphasis of science. Conversely, recognizing that science blends conceptual reasoning with empirical methods provides a more accurate depiction of how scientific questions are approached in practice.

位置1的问题 A way in which scientific questions are different than philosophical ones is that the scientific questions involve more conceptual analysis and require more than observation and experimentation for their solution.FalseTrue

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 41 Karl PopperThomas KuhnDavid HumeJohn LockeMaryam Jameelah

Why is science correlated with systematicity, according to Bird?

According to Laplace et al., which of the following are ways in which the conceptual clarification of scientific terms provided by philosophers can improve science? (Check BOTH that apply)

Science as a “way of knowing” differs from art, religion, and philosophy in that

The Cuttler reading states the postmodernist-inductive method is the primary way scientific researchers use theories.

Jaggar argues that it is possible for scientists to cast aside their emotions and value judgments, and to perform their work completely dispassionately.

In this essay, Harding defends the claim that modern science is culturally-neutral, and does not have any trace of Western culture in it.

小说《三体》中“科学边界”组织致力于探讨的主要学术问题是：

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler