The Cuttler reading states the postmodernist-inductive method is the primary way scientific researchers use theories.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement presents a claim about how scientific researchers use theories, attributing to postmodernist-inductive methods as the primary approach. 
First, consider what typical scientific practice entails: researchers often generate theories through a combination of observations, hypothesis formation, and testing, which is commonly described by hypothetico-deductive reasoning rather than a purely inductive or postmodern approach.
Second, note that postmodernism critiques objectivity and the grand narratives of science, and it does not advocate a single, universal inductive method as the primary path for theory development. In fact, postmodernist critiques are often about the social, political, and contextual influences on knowledge claims, not a cohesive, universally endorsed research protocol.
Third, the claim that postmodernist-inductive methods are the primary way researchers use theories is historically and philosophically debatable. The dominant view in much of the scientific community emphasizes iterative theory-building, testing, refutation, and refinement across multiple methodological strands, not a singular postmodern-inductive framework.
Fourth, if a statement asserts a single primary method across all sciences, that is likely an overgeneralization. Different disciplines employ various reasoning styles (induction, deduction, abduction), modeling, simulation, and empirical testing, depending on the domain and the nature of knowledge being pursued.
Fifth, regarding the provided answer being False: this aligns with mainstream philosophy of science, which recognizes a plurality of methods and critiques overly rigid claims about a postmodern-inductive primacy. The absence of any listed answer options also means we rely on the stated assertion and general principles to assess its truth value.
In summary, the assertion oversimplifies scientific methodology, ignores the critiques and nuances of postmodern thought, and misstates the plurality of inferential approaches used in theory development. Therefore, it is not accurate to say that the postmodernist-inductive method is the primary way scientists use theories.

COMM1225.42231.202540 Quiz 1

The Cuttler reading states the postmodernist-inductive method is the primary way scientific researchers use theories.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 41 Karl PopperThomas KuhnDavid HumeJohn LockeMaryam Jameelah

位置1的问题 A way in which scientific questions are different than philosophical ones is that the scientific questions involve more conceptual analysis and require more than observation and experimentation for their solution.FalseTrue

Why is science correlated with systematicity, according to Bird?

According to Laplace et al., which of the following are ways in which the conceptual clarification of scientific terms provided by philosophers can improve science? (Check BOTH that apply)

Science as a “way of knowing” differs from art, religion, and philosophy in that

Jaggar argues that it is possible for scientists to cast aside their emotions and value judgments, and to perform their work completely dispassionately.

In this essay, Harding defends the claim that modern science is culturally-neutral, and does not have any trace of Western culture in it.

小说《三体》中“科学边界”组织致力于探讨的主要学术问题是：

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler