Locke thinks that I can be the same person in, say, 2002 and 2025, even if I no longer have the same soul.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Here is a step-by-step examination of the statement and the two options.
Option 1: True. Locke's theory of personal identity centers on the continuity of consciousness and memory, not on the sameness of soul or substance. He argues that if a person in 2002 has memories and conscious awareness that can be connected to a person in 2025, and there is a chain of conscious experiences linking them, then they can be the same person despite possible changes in the soul or underlying substance. The key idea is psychological continuity, not metaphysical sameness of soul; therefore, the statement aligns with Locke's position that identity over time does not require an unchanging soul.
Option 2: False. This would claim that Locke requires the same soul for personal identity over time. However, Locke explicitly denies identity being grounded in the sameness of soul or substance. He argues that even if the soul changes or if we suppose different underlying substances, as long as there is a continuous thread of consciousness and memory connecting the person across time, personal identity persists. Thus, labeling the statement as false would misrepresent Locke’s emphasis on psychological continuity over the metaphysical sameness of soul.
In sum, understanding Locke involves focusing on memory and conscious continuity rather than a fixed soul; this supports the claim that a person can be the same over 2002 and 2025 even if the soul is not the same, making the statement true under his framework. The contrast to the false option highlights the common misreading that identity must track an unchanging substance rather than psychological connectedness.

PHL210Y5 Y LEC0101 quiz 13

Locke thinks that I can be the same person in, say, 2002 and 2025, even if I no longer have the same soul.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

David Hume, the British philosopher, famously argued

For Locke, Justin Trudeau is the same human being as the guy who got first elected as prime minister of Canada in 2015 as long as he remembers what he did in 2015.

Locke’s story about the parrot is supposed to illustrate that something can be a rational animal even though it has no soul.

Locke thinks that if my soul is the same as the soul of Socrates, I am the same person as Socrates.

Locke thinks that if the reincarnation of the soul happens, that does not show that the same person can exist at very different points in time, say centuries apart.

For Locke, if there is not the same consciousness between myself and anyone before 9/11, I am not the same person as anyone before 9/11.

Locke thinks that the identity of a human being over time depends on facts about their body.

Locke thinks that if my soul is the same as the soul of Socrates, I still may not be the same person as Socrates.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler