David Hume, the British philosopher, famously argued

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question: 'David Hume, the British philosopher, famously argued'

Option availability: The provided data shows an answer suggestion 'there is no self' but there are no answer options listed. This means we cannot perform per-option analysis since we do not have the discrete alternatives to evaluate. Nevertheless, we can discuss the core claim and how it relates to Hume’s philosophy to help you understand what such a statement would mean.

Context on Hume’s view: David Hume is famous for arguing against the existence of a single, persistent self. He proposed a bundle or collection theory of personal identity, where what we call the 'self' is nothing more than a bundle of perceptions, sensations, memories, and experiences that succeed each other. He argued there is no underlying, unchanging 'I' that experiences these impressions; instead, the sense of self arises from the connectedness and continuity of these perceptions, not from a substantive self. This stance is often contrasted with views that posit a constant soul or self that persists unchanged over time.

If an option asserted 'there is no self' or 'the self is a collection of perceptions rather than a single enduring entity,' that would align with Hume’s bundle theory. However, other philosophers have defended alternatives, such as a more traditional notion of a continuous self or soul, which would be inconsistent with Hume's conclusion.

Critical angles to consider if options were present:
- Misconceptions about persistence: Some might interpret Hume as denying any self at all, which could be an overstatement; he denies a fixed, essential self rather than all subjective experience.
- Scope of claim: Hume’s claim targets personal identity over time, not necessarily the existence of experiences or impressions themselves.
- Comparisons to other philosophies: Kant, for instance, argued for a necessary a priori structure of the mind that provides the unity of experience, which is a different route from Hume’s empirical bundle view.

In summary, without the answer choices, we can still anchor the likely correct interpretation of Hume’s position: the self, as a fixed, unchanging entity, does not exist; instead, there is a bundle of perceptions that gives rise to the sense of self. If future options are provided, you can map each to this framework and assess coherence with Humean theory accordingly.

PSYCH2450 Psych 2450 Prelim 1

David Hume, the British philosopher, famously argued

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

For Locke, Justin Trudeau is the same human being as the guy who got first elected as prime minister of Canada in 2015 as long as he remembers what he did in 2015.

Locke’s story about the parrot is supposed to illustrate that something can be a rational animal even though it has no soul.

Locke thinks that if my soul is the same as the soul of Socrates, I am the same person as Socrates.

Locke thinks that I can be the same person in, say, 2002 and 2025, even if I no longer have the same soul.

Locke thinks that if the reincarnation of the soul happens, that does not show that the same person can exist at very different points in time, say centuries apart.

For Locke, if there is not the same consciousness between myself and anyone before 9/11, I am not the same person as anyone before 9/11.

Locke thinks that the identity of a human being over time depends on facts about their body.

Locke thinks that if my soul is the same as the soul of Socrates, I still may not be the same person as Socrates.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler