Oishi et al. (2011) found that Americans _______________ were happier in years with less national income inequality than in years with more national income inequality and that _____________ explained this effect.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When approaching the question about Oishi et al. (2011), I first map what the study examined and what it found about happiness, inequality, and underlying explanations.
Option A suggests the happiness difference is tied to 'with low self-esteem' and that it is explained by 'social comparison.' While social comparison can influence happiness in some contexts, this option misstates both who is affected (not specifically tied to low self-esteem) and the proposed mechanism identified by the study, making this option unlikely.
Option B states that Americans 'with low income' were happier in years with less inequality, and that this effect was explained by 'perceived fairness and general trust.' This aligns with common interpretations of Oishi et al.'s findings, where lower-income individuals benefited from more fair perceptions and greater trust in society during more egalitarian periods, which helped explain increased well-being.
Option C claims happiness differences occurred 'in wage disputes' and were explained by 'perceived procedural justice.' Although procedural justice can influence satisfaction in organizational or dispute contexts, it does not capture the broader national-income-inequality focus of the study, making this option less accurate.
Option D posits that 'lower SES groups' experienced the effect and that it was due to 'group-membership.' While SES and social identity can matter for happiness under inequality, the specific mechanism emphasized in the study is perceived fairness and general trust, not group-membership, rendering this option incorrect.
In summarizing, we weigh each option against the study’s emphasis on low-income individuals, the relationship between inequality and happiness, and the explanatory role of perceived fairness and general trust. The incorrect choices either misidentify the affected group, the context, or the mechanism, while the correct option accurately reflects the described pattern and mediator in the research.

PSYC30022_2025_SM2 Exam: Trends in Personality& Social Psychology (PSYC30022_2025_SM2)- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Oishi et al. (2011) found that Americans ___ were happier in years with less national income inequality than in years with more national income inequality and that _ explained this effect.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler