If, during peer review, I am not getting the feedback I was hoping to get I should…

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This item presents a question about what to do in peer review when the feedback you receive isn’t what you hoped for, but the list of answer options is missing.

Because no options are provided to evaluate, we cannot perform a choice-by-choice analysis of which statement is best. In general, when feedback diverges from expectations, a constructive approach is to engage actively with the feedback by asking clarifying questions, seeking specific examples, and guiding the discussion to align on criteria, goals, and next steps. This helps transform uncertain or unhelpful feedback into actionable insights that improve the work.

If an option were present that suggested asking questions and steering the discussion in a productive direction, that would align with common best practices in peer review: it promotes understanding, reduces misinterpretation, and keeps the review process collaborative rather than confrontational.

Common pitfalls to avoid in this situation include reacting defensively, dismissing feedback without analysis, or trying to push your own agenda without addressing the reviewer’s concerns. Instead, a balanced approach involves listening, restating key points for accuracy, requesting concrete examples or criteria, and proposing how to address the issues raised.

In contexts where options are missing, you can still apply general guidance: model openness to critique, seek specificity, and document follow-up steps to ensure that the feedback leads to tangible revisions.

Given the provided answer entry "ask questions and lead the discussion in the right direction" appears to reflect a constructive strategy, the reasoning above explains why that approach is often recommended, while also highlighting that the absence of visible options prevents a complete option-by-option critique.

SP25 ESL 117 002 Quiz: Peer Response Training

If, during peer review, I am not getting the feedback I was hoping to get I should…

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Scheduled peer reviews are required for this course. If you don't submit your draft on time to participate in peer review, or you don't review your group members' papers, you will receive a 0 for the peer review unless you:

Why might participating in peer review in one subject help you strengthen your writing for assessments in other subjects?

Articles that have been read and approved by professionals in the same academic discipline as the author are considered to be: AL110

What are some benefits of peer-reviewing someone else's work? Choose all that apply.

Un "peer-reviewed journal" est un terme anglais désignant une revue scientifique évaluée par des pairs. En français, on parle de : (deux bonnes réponses)

What does peer-review mean?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler