Suppose that two theories have different explanations for feature conjunction searches. Both theories make equally good predictions and are currently supported by experimental results. However, one of them has fewer theoretical constructs.

Based on this alone, on what basis would science generally prefer the theoretical account with fewer constructs?

Question

Suppose that two theories have different explanations for feature conjunction searches. Both theories make equally good predictions and are currently supported by experimental results. However, one of them has fewer theoretical constructs.

Based on this alone, on what basis would science generally prefer the theoretical account with fewer constructs?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the basis on which science would typically prefer one theoretical account over another when both make equally good predictions and are equally supported by experimental results, but one theory uses fewer theoretical constructs.
First, the key concept at play is parsimony, often associated with Occam’s razor, which favors simpler explanations that achieve the same explanatory power with fewer assumptions.
Next, consider what fewer constructs imply: a more economical theoretical framework with fewer moving parts reduces the risk of overfitting to current data and tends to be more testable in principle, since extraneous or redundant assumptions can be scrutinized and potentially falsified more easily.
Additionally, a parsimonious theory tends to offer broader applicability because it relies on fewer ad hoc elements to account for phenomena, which can lead to clearer predictions in new or extended contexts.
On the other hand, theories that are more complex with more constructs are not automatically incorrect; they may capture nuances or boundary conditions that a simpler model misses. However, when predictive success and empirical support are already matched, the additional constructs do not provide extra explanatory gain and can hinder clarity and falsifiability.
Given the scenario where both theories are equally supported and predict equally well, the principle of parsimony would guide scientists to prefer the theory with fewer constructs, because it aligns with a preference for simplicity, economy of assumptions, and potentially greater falsifiability.
Note: The prompt does not provide alternative options to evaluate, so this explanation centers on why parsimony is typically the favored criterion in such a situation and why more complex theories would lose out under a parsimony-based evaluation.

COGS14A_SP25_A00 4/9

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which criterion for evaluating a theory refers to being simple rather than complex in explaining personality?

Elizabeth’s sister, Meredith, isn’t answering her phone when Elizabeth calls. Elizabeth thinks, “Well, either Meredith’s phone has been stolen, or the battery died.” Reasoning that Meredith’s phone likely died, and that her phone wasn’t stolen would best illustrate _____.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler