After reading selections from Michelangelo’s poems, Vasari's biographies, and especially Castiglione, along with the discussion of the Paragone in the Oxford Art Online regarding some of the main arguments and stakes in the debates that were prevalent in early sixteenth-century Italy, decide whether the following answer is True or False:

B) Some argued for the superiority of sculpture because it is closer to nature, and requires more effort and skill than painting.

Question

After reading selections from Michelangelo’s poems, Vasari's biographies, and especially Castiglione, along with the discussion of the Paragone in the Oxford Art Online regarding some of the main arguments and stakes in the debates that were prevalent in early sixteenth-century Italy, decide whether the following answer is True or False:

B) Some argued for the superiority of sculpture because it is closer to nature, and requires more effort and skill than painting.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks us to judge a statement about early sixteenth‑century debates on Paragone and the perceived superiority of sculpture versus painting, drawing on Michelangelo’s poems, Vasari’s biographies, and Castiglione, as discussed in Oxford Art Online.
Option A (True): The claim that some argued for the superiority of sculpture because it is closer to nature, and requires more effort and skill than painting is historically plausible. Proponents of the Paragone often argued that sculpture embodies a more direct, three‑dimensional encounter with natural form and anatomy, which could necessitate intense technical mastery, study of proportion, and tactile understanding of materials. In this view, sculpture’s proximity to nature is tied to the artist’s ability to render the visible world more faithfully in a carved or modeled form, which was a common line of defense in early modern debates about the relative merits of the arts.
Option B (False): To claim the statement is false would require evidence that no advocates ever supported sculpture as closer to nature or requiring more skill than painting. However, several sources from the period frame sculpture as a discipline that confronts natural form in a more direct, physical medium—stone, marble, bronze—than painting, and some thinkers and artists argued that this direct encounter with nature demanded exceptional skill and discipline. Yet, it’s important to acknowledge that counterarguments existed: painting could rival sculpture in “nativeness” through color, perspective, and illusion, and not all contemporaries agreed that sculpture was categorically superior. The debate was nuanced, with claims varied by individual artist, medium, and theoretical stance.
Option C (Ambiguity): If one reads these sources strictly, the landscape of opinion is not uniform, and some statements might emphasize that superiority depends on criteria (nature’s closeness, technical difficulty, or expressive capacity) rather than declaring an absolute hierarchy. This would suggest that the truth of the claim hinges on what criterion is prioritized, making a blanket True/False assessment oversimplified.
Option D (Nuance about context): The assertion could reflect a particular strand within the debates (e.g., Michelangelo’s exceptional prowess and certain Casiglionean ideals) while not generalizing to all contemporaries. This would indicate that the statement is not universally valid across all voices in the sixteenth‑century discourse, even if it captures a legitimate position held by some.
In sum, the claim aligns with a commonly documented strand of Paragone argumentation that sculpture’s closeness to nature and its demanding technique were cited in its favor, yet the period’s debates were multifaceted, with strong counterpoints emphasizing painting’s own fidelity to nature, light, and illusion. The nuanced landscape means the statement reflects one position among several, rather than an uncontested universal.

ART H 200 A Thursday 'Paragone' practice quiz (graded but not for credit)

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler