Which of the following are true? According to Busse and Zettelmeyer, planning transitions in advance has ALL of the following benefits (you may select multiple responses):

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks which statements are true according to Busse and Zettelmeyer about planning transitions in advance, and it allows multiple selections.
Option 1: 'Telling you if there is too big of a step between the material in two adjacent slides.' This aligns with the idea that planned transitions help assess pacing and logical flow between slides; a large step could indicate a gap in continuity, so this statement is plausible as a true benefit.
Option 2: 'Telling you if you need to swap the order of two or more slides.' Planning transitions in advance often reveals issues with sequencing, where reordering slides could improve comprehension or emphasis. Therefore, this statement also seems consistent with the benefits described by Busse and Zettelmeyer.
Option 3: 'Making sure that if the person hosting your talk asks, you can tell them what your transitions will be.' Preparing a transition plan typically includes being able to articulate and justify planned transitions to an organizer or host, so this statement fits as a true benefit.
Option 4: 'Making sure that if there's a problem with the slide projector, you always have a quick joke you can tell your audience during the delay.' While preparedness is valuable, having a quick joke as a fallback during a projector delay is not typically cited as a core benefit of planning transitions in advance; this is more of a situational or improvisational tactic rather than a formal benefit described by the authors.
In terms of potential misinterpretations: A common misconception could be that planning transitions only affects slide order, ignoring pacing and host communication; another is assuming humor is a mandated feature of transition planning, which is not a standard benefit. The first three options align with structured preparation, while the fourth mixes in an improvisational coping strategy that isn’t a core listed advantage.
Summary assessment: Options 1, 2, and 3 describe plausible and defensible benefits of planning transitions in advance; option 4 describes a nonessential, situational tactic that is not typically highlighted as a primary benefit in such guidance.

ECON5004 Communication in Economics Quiz 4_week 9_2025

Which of the following are true? According to Busse and Zettelmeyer, planning transitions in advance has ALL of the following benefits (you may select multiple responses):

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler