Which of the following is not a dimension of Taylor and Aalber's (2022) argument (one answer)?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks: which of the following is not a dimension of Taylor and Aalber's (2022) argument?

Option 1: 'Climate risk may lead to the loss of rent income in impacted areas.' This statement describes a potential economic impact of climate risk on property markets and rental incomes. It is a plausible dimension if the authors discuss how climate risk translates into redirected or diminished income streams for property owners and landlords in affected zones.

Option 2: 'Climate risk has created new forms of economic value that can be captured.' This reflects a common scholarly claim that climate risk can generate new markets, financial instruments, or opportunities (e.g., resilience investments, insurance innovations, climate-adaptation services). If the authors discuss market responses and value creation stemming from climate risk, this would be a likely dimension.

Option 3: 'Little Haiti in Miami has suffered disproportionately from flooding as a result of climate change.' This is a specific empirical claim about a particular neighborhood’s experiences. While such a case could illustrate broader inequities or distributional effects, it is not necessarily a general dimension of an argument unless the authors explicitly use this locale as a representative example or a case study to illustrate a general dimension. Without that broader framing, this option reads more like a specific instance rather than a core dimension of a theory or framework.

To discern which is not a dimension, one would check whether each statement aligns with the core components of Taylor and Aalber's theoretical structure (e.g., how climate risk affects economics, markets, and value capture) rather than presenting a localized empirical instance. If the paper enumerates general dimensions such as economic impact on rents and opportunities for value capture, but does not treat a specific neighborhood case as a fundamental dimension, then Option 3 would be the outlier.

Note: If you have access to the exact text of Taylor and Aalber (2022), you can verify by matching each option to the paper’s listed dimensions or thematic sections. If the paper explicitly includes a case study of Little Haiti as an illustration of a dimension, then Option 3 would be considered a dimension; otherwise, it would be the not-dimension choice.

CITC10H3 S LEC01 Quiz 3

Which of the following is not a dimension of Taylor and Aalber's (2022) argument (one answer)?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler