What makes the last movement of the Fourth unconventional?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question: What makes the last movement of the Fourth unconventional?

Option 1: 'There is no recapitulation'.
- In many traditional multi-movement works, especially in the context of sonata form, the recapitulation is a standard feature of the final movement or the movement that closes a larger formal area. Claiming there is no recapitulation would mark the movement as breaking a common structural expectation. If the work in question typically follows sonata-allegro expectations, this would indeed be unconventional; if, however, the composer deliberately avoids a recapitulation in that movement as part of a deliberate formal invention, then this could be a valid reason for unconventionality. Without knowing the exact work, this option hinges on whether the form normally used here includes a recapitulation.

Option 2: 'it is a giant fugue from beginning to end'.
- Labeling a finale as a 'giant fugue' suggests a rigorous contrapuntal texture throughout the entire movement, which is highly unusual for a typical symphonic finale or concert movement. A fugue requires a clear subject, entries, and developed counterpoint, and sustaining that throughout an entire movement would be a distinctive, attention-grabbing formal choice. If the last movement uses a continuous fugue texture, this would indeed stand out as unconventional compared to most large-scale finales that mix forms (sonata, rondo,Theme-and-Variations, etc.). If, conversely, the movement only intermittently contains fugue-like episodes or a short fugue section, this option would be an overstatement.

Option 3: 'The exposition does not repeat'.
- The exposition typically returns in many sonata-form movements, either via a repeat or a restatement after a development. Saying the exposition does not repeat implies a deliberate departure from standard classical form, which would be an unusual and noteworthy choice. However, some composers intentionally avoid exposition repeats in certain works or movements to achieve a tighter, more compact structure. The interpretation depends on the intended formal plan of the piece; as a standalone claim, it points to a structural departure rather than a mere surface detail.

Option 4: 'It includes a chorus and it's internally divided into different movements'.
- Including a chorus in the last movement would be notable, since choral finales are relatively rare in many instrumental traditions, though they occur in some late Romantic and modern works (and in some symphonies with vocal elements). The phrase 'internally divided into different movements' within a single last movement suggests a multipart or multi-sectional construction that remains one large movement, which would be unconventional if the work is typically conceived as a single continuous finale. If the last movement is actually a multi-part finale with distinct sections and a chorus, that would indeed set it apart from more straightforward, continuous finales. If the chorus and internal divisions are standard for the particular composer or work, then this would not be unconventional for that context.

Overall, each option highlights a potential way the final movement could deviate from expectations: form (recapitulation, exposition repeats), texture (continuous fugue), or inclusion of vocal/sectional structure (chorus or multi-part segmentation). The key to selecting the truly unconventional aspect is knowing the specific Fourth being discussed, since conventions vary by composer and era. Absent that context, all options describe plausible kinds of departures from the norm, and each hinges on the established formal assumptions for that particular work.

MUS 010 A01-A04 SQ 2025 Beethoven's Late Style

What makes the last movement of the Fourth unconventional?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler