Thottathil compares the organic farming movements in California and Kerala to make the point that organic farming is not the same everywhere in the world. She says:

Question

Thottathil compares the organic farming movements in California and Kerala to make the point that organic farming is not the same everywhere in the world.  She says:

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a quotation or claim by Thottathil comparing organic farming movements in California and Kerala, and asks which statement best reflects her point. Since the provided data lacks the identified correct answer, I will evaluate each option in terms of accuracy and plausibility based on the idea that she is arguing that organic farming is not uniform worldwide and that movements differ by context.

Option 1: "The organic farming movement in Kerala benefits farmers, while in California it harms farmers." This is a strong absolute claim. In reality, both places have complex, mixed outcomes: some farmers may benefit from organic practices, while others may face costs, market barriers, certification expenses, or yield challenges. Saying Kerala benefits and California harms oversimplifies the spectrum of effects and ignores variations among farmers, regions, and market structures. It is therefore unlikely to precisely capture a nuanced comparative point the author is making.

Option 2: "The organic farming movement in Kerala began with grassroots support from farmers, while in California it emerged through consumer awareness and advocacy." This option highlights divergent origins, which aligns with the general understanding that grassroots movements are common in Kerala due to smallholder participation, whereas California has seen strong consumer, advocacy, and policy-driven movements. If Thottathil is stressing that the movements are not uniform and have different genesis, this statement could plausibly reflect her argument.

Option 3: "Food produced with organic farming methods in Kerala is more nutritious than the same organic food produced in California." This asserts a comparative nutritional superiority tied specifically to geography. Nutritional content differences between organic foods from two regions would be highly contestable and would require specific empirical evidence. Most comparative discussions about organic farming focus on practices, economics, sustainability, or social movements rather than claims of inherent nutritional differences by location. This option seems less likely as the central point of her comparison.

Option 4: "Organic farming relies on immigrant labor in both California and Kerala, but communist leadership in Kerala has resulted in more protections for farmworkers." This combines labor dynamics and political leadership in a way that may be too specific or political for a broad comparative claim about organic movements. While labor and policy contexts differ between the two regions, asserting reliance on immigrant labor in both places and attributing worker protections to Kerala’s leadership introduces a particular ideological framing that may not be the core thrust of Thottithil’s contrast about geographic variation in organic farming movements. This could be inaccurate or overly reductive depending on the source material.

In summary, option 2 appears most plausible if the intended point is to contrast origins and drivers of the organic farming movements between Kerala and California. Options 1 and 3 rely on sweeping, absolute or debatable nutritional claims that are unlikely to reflect nuanced comparative arguments. Option 4 introduces a political-porky framing that may not align with Thottathil’s central emphasis on differences in movement genesis and context.

Because the answer field is empty, we cannot definitively identify the correct choice from the provided data. The analysis above aims to illuminate the strengths and weaknesses of each option in light of a typical argument that organic movements differ by local context, origins, and socioeconomic factors. If you have access to the exact wording of Thottathil’s claim or the source material, we could pinpoint which option best matches her intended point.

ANTH:1046:0001 Spr25 Quiz 6 opens after class Friday 5/2 and closes Saturday at 11:30 am

Thottathil compares the organic farming movements in California and Kerala to make the point that organic farming is not the same everywhere in the world. She says:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler