Please review the tutorial #3 slides and write two paragraphs that are a minimum of 250 words each. The first paragraph should answer the question: what are the most valuable insights or things you learned from the tutorial slides? The second paragraph should answer the question: what advice on how to do well on papers would you give someone for how to succeed on university papers.

Requirements for full points: 500 word minimum (word count at the bottom), proper grammar is used, do NOT use AI text, and answers are specific and personal (use first person, personal examples, etc.).

Question

Please review the tutorial #3 slides and write two paragraphs that are a minimum of 250 words each. The first paragraph should answer the question: what are the most valuable insights or things you learned from the tutorial slides? The second paragraph should answer the question: what advice on how to do well on papers would you give someone for how to succeed on university papers.

Requirements for full points: 500 word minimum (word count at the bottom), proper grammar is used, do NOT use AI text, and answers are specific and personal (use first person, personal examples, etc.).

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The provided data presents an essay-style prompt rather than a multiple-choice question, so there are no answer options to evaluate in the traditional sense. Instead, we can assess how well the given response engages with the prompt and what it covers or omits, along with suggestions for improvement.

First, consider what the prompt asks for: two paragraphs, each a minimum of 250 words. The first should identify the most valuable insights learned from Tutorial #3 slides, and the second should offer personalized advice on how to succeed with university papers. It also requires the writer to use first-person, include specific examples, and reach a total of at least 500 words.

Now, examining the provided answer content: the response clearly centers on the key idea that academic papers should be structured arguments rather than mere summaries, highlighting critical thinking, synthesis, and a persuasive narrative supported by evidence. This aligns well with the prompt’s intent and demonstrates understanding of central concepts such as crafting a specific, debatable thesis, the utility of outlining, effective integration of sources, and the importance of transitions and coherence. The writer gives concrete observations from the tutorial, such as identifying an effective thesis statement, the value of outlining to guide flow and prevent tangents, and the importance of ensuring every part of the paper ties back to the central argument. This indicates careful engagement with the material and use of personal reflection to articulate learning.

On the other hand, several aspects indicate the response does not fully satisfy the rubric as written. The prompt requires two distinct paragraphs, each at least 250 words. The provided text appears to be a single, continuous paragraph addressing what was learned, rather than two separate sections; it also does not appear to include a second paragraph offering advice on how to do well on university papers. As a result, the response does not meet the structural and length requirements, which are crucial for full credit. The response would benefit from a clear bifurcation: one paragraph focusing on valuable insights from Tutorial #3 slides, and a separate paragraph offering practical, personalized advice for succeeding on university papers, including examples of habits, revision strategies, and concrete steps a student can take in their own writing process.

Additionally, while the writing is coherent and uses first-person narration, the word count appears limited relative to the 500-word minimum. To strengthen adherence to the assignment, the writer should expand each paragraph with more detailed, specific incidents from their own practice, such as how the outlined approach changed a rough draft into a more focused argument, or a concrete example of how they would revise a paragraph to maintain a steady argumentative thread. Incorporating measurable strategies (e.g., a checklist for thesis specificity, a protocol for integrating quotes, or a routine for revising introductions and conclusions) would also help meet the minimum length and make the advice more actionable.

In terms of style and voice, the response uses a personable, first-person tone and includes reflective observations about the teaching material, which is appropriate for the assignment. To elevate the quality further, the writer could incorporate explicit references to particular slides or examples from Tutorial #3, mention any limitations or uncertainties they encountered, and describe how they would apply the tutorial insights to a future drafting workflow. Including specific, candid personal examples (e.g., a prior paper that suffered from a weak thesis or a recent revision that benefited from a formal outline) would strengthen authenticity and illustrate growth.

In summary, the answer demonstrates a solid grasp of the tutorial's core messages about argument, structure, and cohesive writing, but it falls short of the stated two-paragraph, 500-word minimum requirement and lacks the second paragraph offering personalized advice on succeeding with university papers. To meet the rubric, the writer should craft two clearly separated paragraphs, each meeting the word-count threshold, with rich personal anecdotes, explicit references to tutorial content, and concrete, actionable strategies for future writing projects.

SOC100H1 F LEC0201 Make-Up Tutorial Activity #3

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler