How are you feeling about your draft? What do you see as its strengths and/or weaknesses? Is there anything specific you would like your peers to pay special attention to as they review your work? How might they best help you in terms of feedback? Please write for the full eight minutes.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents an essay-style prompt rather than a multiple-choice question, so there are no answer options to analyze. Here, I will outline how to craft a thoughtful response that meets the prompt’s aims and how to guide peers in providing useful feedback.

Restate the task intent: You are asked to reflect on your draft, identify its strengths and weaknesses, articulate aspects you want peers to focus on during reviews, and explain how they can best help with feedback. The assignment also asks you to write for the full eight minutes, implying a thorough, paced, reflective response rather than a brief summary.

Approach to evaluating your draft (strengths and weaknesses):
- Start with a balanced assessment: note concrete strengths (e.g., clear argument, strong evidence, coherent structure, engaging opening) and concrete weaknesses (e.g., gaps in analysis, underdeveloped claims, method or data issues, clarity or transitions, formatting or citation problems).
- Provide specific examples from your draft for each identified strength or weakness. For instance, point to a paragraph where the claim is well-supported, or to a section where the logic becomes tenuous.
- Assess core dimensions: thesis clarity, argument coherence, evidence quality and relevance, organization and flow, voice and tone, and technical aspects like grammar, citation style, and formatting.

What you want peers to pay attention to during review:**

- Clarity of the main argument: Is the thesis immediately clear, and is every paragraph oriented toward supporting that thesis?
- Strength and relevance of evidence: Are the sources credible? Do the claims have sufficient data or reasoning to back them up?
- Logical progression: Do ideas flow logically from one section to the next? Are transitions smooth?
- Depth of analysis: Are conclusions justified by the evidence? Are counterarguments anticipated and addressed?
- Clarity of methodological choices (if applicable): Are procedures, data collection, or theoretical frameworks clearly explained?
- Style and readability: Is the language precise and engaging? Are there awkward sentences or jargon that could be simplified?
- Formatting and citation accuracy: Are references complete and correctly formatted? Is the document sectioned consistently (headings, page numbers, citations)?
- Specific requests for feedback: Highlight where you want advice (e.g., “Is the central claim persuasive?” or “Suggest a stronger counterargument to address.”)

How peers can best help with feedback:
- Provide targeted questions: Ask reviewers to respond to specific prompts (e.g., “Is the conclusion supported by the data?”; “Where is the argument least convincing?”).
- Quote or reference exact passages: Encourage them to indicate lines or paragraphs that need revision and explain why.
- Offer concrete suggestions: Request concrete edits, such as rewording, adding evidence, restructuring a paragraph, or clarifying a claim.
- Balance praise with critique: Suggest they note both strong elements and areas for improvement, to keep feedback constructive and motivating.
- Propose next steps: Ask for guidance on what to revise first and what to focus on in a subsequent draft.

Eight-minute writing strategy: consider allocating time to capture a thorough self-assessment at the start, followed by a paced, detailed outline of strengths and weaknesses, then concrete requests for peer feedback. You might structure it as: 1–2 minutes for overall impression, 2–3 minutes for strengths, 2–3 minutes for weaknesses with examples, and 1–2 minutes for specific feedback requests.

If you need, I can help you transform this reflection into a polished eight-minute essay by outlining sections, drafting prompts for peers, and suggesting specific examples to cite from your draft.

UWP 007V 004 WQ 2025 Quiz Credit for March 11th

How are you feeling about your draft? What do you see as its strengths and/or weaknesses? Is there anything specific you would like your peers to pay special attention to as they review your work? How might they best help you in terms of feedback? Please write for the full eight minutes.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler