In comparison to hands-on training methods, most presentation methods provide a better training experience and learners retain more information.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks us to evaluate the statement: 'In comparison to hands-on training methods, most presentation methods provide a better training experience and learners retain more information.'

Option 1: True
- This option asserts that presentation methods outperform hands-on training in both training experience and information retention. A common misunderstanding here is assuming that more visual or lecture-based formats inherently lead to better outcomes for all learners. In practice, research on learning often shows that passive reception (e.g., long presentations) can yield lower retention than active, hands-on engagement for many types of skills, especially procedural or tacit knowledge.
- A more nuanced view would recognize that presentation methods can be effective for introducing concepts,Providing structure, or delivering standardized information, but they are frequently complemented by hands-on practice to improve retention. If the claim is generalized as 'most' presentations being superior, that contradicts much of the evidence supporting active learning and experiential methods.

Option 2: False
- This option would be consistent with the widely supported view in educational psychology that active, hands-on or experiential learning often enhances retention and transfer of knowledge more effectively than passive presentation alone.
- It acknowledges that the effectiveness of a training method depends on factors such as the nature of the material, learner preferences, and the inclusion of practice opportunities. Presentations can be valuable components when combined with interaction, practice, and feedback, but they are not universally superior to hands-on methods.

Both options hinge on the degree of activity and engagement promoted by the teaching approach. The statement as written makes a broad universal claim about 'most presentation methods' being better, which conflicts with a large body of evidence favoring active, hands-on learning for durable retention. The analysis above highlights why the True option is problematic and why the False option aligns more closely with established findings, while also noting nuances about when presentations can be effective.

37:533:312:E1 DEVELOPING TALENT Summer 2025 - Comprehensive Final Exam - Developing Talent

In comparison to hands-on training methods, most presentation methods provide a better training experience and learners retain more information.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler