Having read Chapter 13, who do you agree with more on the debate that Kahneman outlines between Paul Slovic and Cass Sunstein in regards to the role of Public and Experts in assessing risk.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This prompt asks you to choose a stance on a debate about the role of the public and experts in assessing risk, as presented by Kahneman and as discussed in Chapter 13. Since the provided answer field is empty, I will analyze each option in terms of its plausibility and what each stance generally implies, so you can determine which aligns with the readings.

Option 1: "Agree a lot more with Slovic's perspective". Slovic emphasizes the public's role in risk perception, often highlighting how laypeople use heuristics and values when judging risk, and he advocates involving public input in risk assessment. Choosing this would reflect a belief that public judgment and values are essential components of risk assessment and that expert authority should be balanced with public deliberation. If Chapter 13 presents Slovic as arguing for broader public engagement and acknowledging lay intuitions, this option could be a good match.

Option 2: "Agree somewhat more with Slovic's perspective". This stance suggests partial alignment with Slovic: recognizing some value in public input while not overemphasizing it relative to expert analysis. It implies a nuanced view where experts provide technical analysis, but public and stakeholder perspectives contribute to legitimacy, trust, and context. If the chapter presents a middle-ground view, this option would be reasonable.

Option 3: "Agree somewhat more with Sunstein's perspective". Sunstein often advocates for structured decision-making, risk governance, and sometimes emphasizes the importance of expert guidance while also noting the need for transparency and consideration of public concerns. A "somewhat more" alignment would indicate you value expert framing and institutional processes but still allow for public considerations to influence outcomes to a degree. This could fit Chapter 13 if it leans toward governance mechanisms that integrate both expertise and public input without fully privileging one side.

Option 4: "Agree a lot more with Sunstein's perspective". If Sunstein is portrayed as prioritizing expert analysis, regulatory design, and credible risk communication within formal processes, this option would reflect a strong confidence in expert-led assessment and governance structures, with public input perhaps constrained to channels like public comment or stakeholder processes. Choose this if the chapter presents Sunstein as arguing that expert frameworks and institutional rules are crucial to reliable risk assessment and decision-making.

Important considerations to help decide: 
- Look for phrases in Chapter 13 about the nature of risk, evidence, and uncertainty. Do they emphasize lay intuitions and public values (Slovic) or call for planning, regulation, and expert interpretation (Sunstein)?
- Check how the chapter frames legitimacy, trust, and accountability. Does it argue for broad participatory input or for formal expert-led governance?
- Note any examples or case studies used to illustrate public vs. expert roles. Do they illustrate crowdsourcing risk judgments or demonstrate the limits of non-expert assessments?
- Reflect on Kahneman’s own framework in Thinking, Fast and Slow regarding heuristics, biases, and expertise. Does the chapter tie those ideas to Slovic’s or Sunstein’s positions, and which stance does it seem to support more?

If you still feel uncertain after rereading, try to map your impression to the core contrast: public values and deliberation versus structured expert governance. The option that most closely mirrors the central takeaway you derived from Chapter 13 should be your pick.

SP25 RMI 660 001 Engaged Learning 19: Experts vs the Public

Having read Chapter 13, who do you agree with more on the debate that Kahneman outlines between Paul Slovic and Cass Sunstein in regards to the role of Public and Experts in assessing risk.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler