33.

destructive self-interest e.g., avoiding
[ Select ]
Work responsibilities
Unconditional love
Governance structures
Outside businesses
Family discussions
Creative innovation
Employment policies
Younger generations
Melting pots

Question

33.

destructive self-interest e.g., avoiding 
[ Select ]
Work responsibilities
Unconditional love
Governance structures
Outside businesses
Family discussions
Creative innovation
Employment policies
Younger generations
Melting pots

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a set of potential selections for completing the phrase: 'destructive self-interest e.g., avoiding [Select]'. The listed items after that prompt are the candidate options to fill in the blank, so each one should be evaluated for relevance and plausibility in the idea of destructive self-interest.

Option: Work responsibilities
- This choice aligns with the notion that destructive self-interest can manifest as avoiding duties or responsibilities that are expected of an individual. Skipping or neglecting work tasks can benefit the individual in the short term but harms others or the broader goals in the longer term, which fits the concept of self-serving harm.

Option: Unconditional love
- While unconditional love is generally seen as a positive value, it is not typically framed as a form of destructive self-interest. Avoiding responsibilities or self-serving avoidance would be a more typical example of destructive behavior than choosing unconditional affection as a problematic motive.

Option: Governance structures
- Governance structures are systems or rules, not a personal behavior pattern. Destructive self-interest usually describes an individual's actions rather than abstract organizational constructs. Therefore this option starts from a less direct relation to the idea of personal self-serving avoidance.

Option: Outside businesses
- Engaging with outside businesses could be neutral or positive depending on context. It does not inherently illustrate avoiding duties as a self-serving motive. Without additional context tying it to self-interest, it is a weaker fit for the concept described.

Option: Family discussions
- Family discussions are social interactions rather than a process of self-interested evasion. Unless framed as avoiding family duties or conversations for personal gain, this option does not clearly capture destructive self-interest.

Option: Creative innovation
- Creative innovation is typically associated with positive advancement and problem solving. It does not inherently describe a self-serving avoidance or destructive motive, so it’s not a natural fit for the described concept.

Option: Employment policies
- Employment policies are organizational guidelines. They reflect institutional rules rather than individual acts of self-serving avoidance. This makes it a less direct match to the notion of destructive self-interest.

Option: Younger generations
- Referring to younger generations is about a demographic group, not a behavioral tendency. Unless the context frames it as avoiding responsibilities toward that group for personal gain, it does not illustrate destructive self-interest on its own.

Option: Melting pots
- Melting pots describe a cultural concept about assimilation and integration, not an action demonstrating self-serving avoidance. Like the governance structures option, it’s an abstract construct rather than a personal behavior example.

In summary, among the listed options, the one that most directly exemplifies destructive self-interest as avoidance of personally burdensome duties is Work responsibilities, because it captures the self-serving motive of evading obligations that exist to the benefit of others or the collective. The other items either describe positive concepts, broad systems, or contexts that do not inherently illustrate the self-serving avoidance pattern described by the prompt.

DEC 10 DEC 10 Diagnostic Reading Test

33. destructive self-interest e.g., avoiding [ Select ] Work responsibilities Unconditional love Governance structures Outside businesses Family discussions Creative innovation Employment policies Younger generations Melting pots

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Theory X is consistent with participative management.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler