The time value of a put option is I) the difference between the option's price and the value it would have if it were expiring immediately.II) the same as the present value of the option's expected future cash flows.III) the difference between the option's price and its expected future value.IV) different from the usual time value of money concept.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents four statements about the time value of a put option. 
Option I states that the time value is the difference between the option's price and the value it would have if it were expiring immediately. In option pricing, this is a standard definition: Time value = Option price - Intrinsic value (the value if exercised now). For a put, intrinsic value is max(K - S, 0), and the remaining amount when you subtract that from the market price is the time value. This interpretation aligns with how traders separate premium into intrinsic value and time value.
Option II claims the time value is the same as the present value of the option's expected future cash flows. This is not accurate because the option's price reflects not only expected future cash flows but also the probability-weighted outcomes, volatility, and time to expiration; equating time value to PV of expected cash flows oversimplifies and miscasts what time value represents.
Option III states that the time value is the difference between the option's price and its expected future value. This is imprecise because the “expected future value” framework would conflate several pricing components and doesn’t match the standard decomposition of option price into intrinsic value plus time value. It also ignores the role of time and volatility in generating time value.
Option IV claims the time value is different from the usual time value of money concept. Indeed, the time value of an option captures the premium attached to potential future payoff due to time and volatility, which is a distinct notion from the generic time value of money used in discounting cash flows. They are related ideas but not the same thing, so this statement highlights the conceptual distinction.
In summary, I is a correct description of how time value is defined for an option, II is a mischaracterization that conflates with PV of expected cash flows, III uses an imprecise framing that does not match the standard definition, and IV correctly points out that option time value is not the same as conventional time value of money. Therefore, the statements that align with the conventional understanding are I and IV, while II and III are incorrect.

FINS2624-Portfolio Mgmt - T1 2025

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

An American-style call option with six months to maturity has a strike price of $41. The underlying stock now sells for $50. The call premium is $14 and the interest rate is 10%. What is the time value of the call?

Before expiration, the time value of an at the money put option is always

Which of the following best describes the time value of an At-the-Money (ATM) option?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler