Refer to the table of information about Go-Fast and Interweb again. What will be the likely outcome if the two firms act in a rivalrous (competitive) manner?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Refer to the table of information about Go-Fast and Interweb again. What will be the likely outcome if the two firms act in a rivalrous (competitive) manner?
Select one:
 a. Both firms will earn $10 million dollars profit each
 b. Interweb will earn $70 million profit and Go-Fast will earn $5 million profit
 c. Interweb will earn $5 million profit and Go-Fast will earn $70 million profit
 d. Both firms will earn $50 million dollars profit

Option a: Both firms will earn $10 million dollars profit each. In many basic rivalrous (competitive) scenarios, firms select strategies that split profits more evenly when they cannot cooperate and there are constraints or market forces that prevent one firm from extracting a much larger share without triggering retaliation or a price/quantity response from the other. If the table information shows symmetrical payoffs or a balance point under competitive behavior, $10 million for each can reflect a Nash-like outcome or a forced split due to competitive pressures. This option aligns with a scenario where both firms end up with equal profits as a consequence of rivalry.

Option b: Interweb will earn $70 million profit and Go-Fast will earn $5 million profit. This describes a highly asymmetric split, where one firm dominates dramatically. In a rivalrous setting, such a stark disparity would typically require one firm to capture most of the market share, possibly due to first-mover advantage, price discrimination, or a critical competitive edge. However, unless the table explicitly shows one firm’s outsized advantage and the other being constrained, this outcome is less typical for a symmetric competitive interaction.

Option c: Interweb will earn $5 million profit and Go-Fast will earn $70 million profit. This is the inverse of option b, presenting the same asymmetry but flipped. The reasoning against it mirrors option b: a dominant advantage for one firm in a rivalrous context would usually be justified by specific market dynamics or strategic moves represented in the provided table. Without such justification, this option is less consistent with a balanced competitive outcome.

Option d: Both firms will earn $50 million dollars profit. An equal split at a much higher level than option a might be plausible if the table indicates a high-collaborative payoff or a market with strong mutual capacity to sustain higher profits under rivalry. However, in a straightforward rivalrous scenario without cooperation, such a large equal payoff could imply an oligopoly with collusive tendencies or shared market profits that aren’t typical of pure competition. If the table emphasizes competitive behavior rather than collusion, this option may be unlikely.

Summary of reasoning: Evaluating rivalrous outcomes typically involves considering whether profits split evenly due to competitive pressures, or whether a firm captures a much larger share due to market power. The presented options include balanced and highly asymmetric possibilities. Based on common competitive dynamics and the contextual cue of rivalrous behavior, the even, modest split of profits is a plausible, straightforward interpretation for a competitive outcome, whereas extreme asymmetry requires extra justification not provided in the prompt. The option presenting an equal, modest profit for both firms best fits a standard competitive setting when both players face similar constraints and responses from one another.

Refer to the table of information about Go-Fast and Interweb again. What will be the likely outcome if the two firms act in a rivalrous (competitive) manner?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following best represents the most distinctive characteristic of an oligopoly?

Question at position 30 The television industry in the United States is controlled by a limited number of giant corporations, making the industry a(n) ______. agglomerationfree marketmonopolisticoligopolistic

Refer to the table of information about Go-Fast and Interweb again. What will be the likely outcome if the two firms act in a rivalrous (competitive) manner?

What does 'mutual interdependence' refer to?

Which market structure is game theory most applicable to?

What does 'mutual interdependence' refer to?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler