According to Nussbaum, treating things as objects is sufficient for objectification.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Claiming that simply treating things as objects is sufficient for objectification is an oversimplification of Nussbaum's view on objectification. 
Option 1: True. The statement suggests that objectification can be fully captured by the act of treating another as an object without additional conditions. In contrast, Nussbaum argues that objectification involves a cluster of experiential and structural features, such as treating someone as a tool for one's purposes, denying autonomy, and failing to acknowledge subjectivity. Merely treating something as an object does not automatically entail all aspects of objectification, and this makes the statement incomplete or inaccurate. 
Option 2: False. In Nussbaum's account, objectification is a multi-faceted process that cannot be reduced to the single act of treating someone or something as an object. She emphasizes dimensions like instrumentalization (using someone as a means to an end), denial of autonomy, inertness to preferences, ownership or control over agency, and the inability to see the other as a full human subject with their own goals and experiences. Therefore, simply treating objects as things does not by itself constitute full objectification; the concept requires analyzing the broader relational and moral implications that go beyond mere objectification in the narrow sense. 
In sum, the reasoning shows that the proposed criterion is too narrow to capture Nussbaum's conception of objectification, which encompasses more than the act of treating something as an object and includes several dependent harms and dehumanizing dynamics.

PHI 007Y A01 WQ 2025 Final Exam

According to Nussbaum, treating things as objects is sufficient for objectification.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to Nussbaum, instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified.

According to Nussbaum (discussing Marx), the objectification of workers in a capitalist society exhibits instrumentality.

'Complimentarity' is not one of Nussbaum's 7 types of objectification.

For Nussbaum, objectification is a necessary condition for an action to be morally wrong.

According to Nussbaum (discussing Marx), the objectification of workers in a capitalist society exhibits instrumentality.

According to Nussbaum, slavery does not involve objectification by inertness.

According to Nussbaum, instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified.

For Nussbaum, objectification is a necessary condition for an action to be morally wrong.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler