According to Nussbaum, instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In considering Nussbaum's account of objectification and instrumentality, we need to assess what it means to treat someone as a mere tool or means to an end. 
Option 1: True. If we said instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified, this would imply you can treat someone as a means while still maintaining full regard for their feelings. However, Nussbaum argues that objectifying treatment—particularly instrumentalizing another person—replaces or ignores the other person’s own ends and autonomy. This makes the statement unlikely to be accurate because instrumentalization typically involves reduced consideration of the other’s subjectivity. 
Option 2: False. This aligns with Nussbaum’s view that to objectify someone is to treat them as a tool for one's purposes, which inherently involves a diminished recognition of their humanity, autonomy, and well-being. While it is possible in theory to feel affection or have positive feelings toward the objectified, the core problem is that such feelings do not counteract the instrumental stance itself. Thus, instrumentality does entail a kind of neglect or de-emphasis of the other’s considerations in the service of one’s ends. 
In sum, the claim that instrumentality does not entail lacking considerations or feelings for the objectified runs counter to Nussbaum’s portrayal of objectification as treating a person as a means rather than as a full bearer of ends, and therefore the statement is not correct.

PHI 007Y A01 WQ 2025 Week 3 Quiz

According to Nussbaum, instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to Nussbaum, instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified.

According to Nussbaum (discussing Marx), the objectification of workers in a capitalist society exhibits instrumentality.

'Complimentarity' is not one of Nussbaum's 7 types of objectification.

For Nussbaum, objectification is a necessary condition for an action to be morally wrong.

According to Nussbaum (discussing Marx), the objectification of workers in a capitalist society exhibits instrumentality.

According to Nussbaum, treating things as objects is sufficient for objectification.

According to Nussbaum, slavery does not involve objectification by inertness.

For Nussbaum, objectification is a necessary condition for an action to be morally wrong.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler