'Complimentarity' is not one of Nussbaum's 7 types of objectification.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's parse the claim and the available choices carefully. The statement being evaluated is: 'Complimentarity' is not one of Nussbaum's 7 types of objectification.
Option 1: True. This asserts that 'complimentarity' does not appear on Nussbaum's list. In Martha Nussbaum's framework on objectification, she outlines seven specific forms or types of objectification (such as instrumentalization, fungibility, denial of autonomy, inertness, infantilization, ownership, and reduction to body or body parts). The term 'complimentarity' is not among these enumerated types. Therefore, describing the statement as true aligns with the canonical list she presents. The reasoning hinges on recognizing her defined categories rather than introducing an unfamiliar term.
Option 2: False. This would claim that 'complimentarity' is indeed one of the seven types. Since Nussbaum’s published categories do not include a type by that name, this option would contradict the established list and thus is incorrect interpretation of her framework. A student might confuse related ideas with complementarity, but the formal taxonomy remains distinct from that term.
Option 3: Not enough information to tell. This would suggest the provided material does not specify whether 'complimentarity' appears on the list. However, the question references Nussbaum’s specific taxonomy of seven objectifications, a well-documented set. If the student has access to Nussbaum’s framework or the course materials defining the seven types, enough information exists to determine that 'complimentarity' is not among them. Therefore, this option would be an unnecessarily cautious stance given the standard reference.
In summary, option 1 is the correct interpretation because 'complimentarity' is not listed among Nussbaum's seven types of objectification; the others misstate or overstate the scope based on the canonical taxonomy.

PHI 007Y 001 SS1 2025 Week 3 Quiz

'Complimentarity' is not one of Nussbaum's 7 types of objectification.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to Nussbaum, instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified.

According to Nussbaum (discussing Marx), the objectification of workers in a capitalist society exhibits instrumentality.

For Nussbaum, objectification is a necessary condition for an action to be morally wrong.

According to Nussbaum (discussing Marx), the objectification of workers in a capitalist society exhibits instrumentality.

According to Nussbaum, treating things as objects is sufficient for objectification.

According to Nussbaum, slavery does not involve objectification by inertness.

According to Nussbaum, instrumentality does not entail failing to have considerations or feelings for the objectified.

For Nussbaum, objectification is a necessary condition for an action to be morally wrong.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler