Martin Luther King Jr. suggests that violence is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Examining the statement about Martin Luther King Jr.'s views on violence, we consider what MLK argued about the nature and purpose of nonviolence.
Option 1: True. The claim that violence is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win understanding aligns with MLK’s emphasis on nonviolence as a method to convert rather than defeat an adversary. MLK argued that nonviolent action seeks to awaken a sense of justice in the opponent while respecting the opponent’s humanity, and that violence tends to degrade both the aggressor and the victim by humiliating and dehumanizing, rather than fostering lasting understanding or moral progress. This interpretation is consistent with his calls for disciplined, peaceful resistance that aims to transform hearts and minds, not merely to punish.
Option 2: False. If one were to take this stance, they would be claiming MLK approved of violence as a morally permissible means to achieve goals. However, MLK consistently rejected violence on moral grounds, arguing that it is both immoral and counterproductive because it often deepens resentment, perpetuates a cycle of retaliation, and undermines the moral legitimacy of the cause. He insisted that the true aim of justice requires love and disciplined action toward the opponent’s conversion, not their annihilation or humiliation, making the “false” interpretation incompatible with his core philosophy.
To assess the claim, it helps to recall MLK’s framing of nonviolence as a powerful ethical discipline: the goal is justice achieved through love, not through overwhelming force or dehumanizing tactics, and success is measured by whether the adversary’s heart and mind can be moved toward reconciliation rather than whether they are defeated. With that lens, the statement’s key components—immorality of violence and the emphasis on understanding over humiliation—are central to MLK’s argument, whereas the alternative view would require a different, non-MLK standpoint that endorses violence as morally acceptable.
In sum, the analysis hinges on MLK’s consistent stance: nonviolence is morally superior and aimed at conversion and understanding, not humiliation or annihilation. The statement, therefore, reflects his ethical position and rhetorical strategy, while the opposing view would misrepresent his commitment to nonviolent means and transformative social change.

25SU_HUM1_13355 Module 3 Quiz (MLK and X)

Martin Luther King Jr. suggests that violence is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Who significantly influenced the teachings of Martin Luther King?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler