In the Moving to Opportunity study, only some groups of children who were moved to lower-poverty neighborhoods benefited, because the increase in well-being was

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) study and why benefits from moving to lower-poverty neighborhoods occurred only for some groups of children. 
Option content: The provided answer option is that the increase in well-being was dependent on the children’s ages when they moved. 
First, consider the core idea: neighborhood effects are not uniform across all children; developmental stage can influence how a change in environment translates into well-being outcomes. 
- If younger children move earlier in life, they may experience longer exposure to better neighborhood conditions, potentially shaping cognitive development, academic opportunities, and social experiences in a more lasting way. This makes age a plausible moderator of effects. 
- Conversely, older children or adolescents might already have established routines, peer networks, or behaviors that are less easily altered by a change in environment, leading to smaller or delayed benefits. This also supports the notion that age can moderate outcomes. 
Now, since there are no additional answer options provided, we cannot evaluate alternatives directly. However, evaluating the stated option on its face:
- Strength: It aligns with a plausible mechanism in the literature—that heterogeneity in treatment effects often arises from moderators like age, which can influence how much a child benefits from relocating to a less-poverty context. 
- Potential limitation: Without the full spectrum of options, we cannot rule out other relevant moderators (e.g., sex, baseline risk, family stability) or specify the domains of well-being (academic achievement, health, social-emotional outcomes) that were differentially affected. 
In summary, the claim that the increase in well-being being dependent on the children’s ages when they moved reflects a reasonable and commonly observed pattern in neighborhood-effect research, where developmental timing can moderate benefits. The strength of this explanation rests on the idea that age acts as a critical moderator shaping exposure duration and developmental sensitivity to environmental changes.

SOC 110-003 Quiz 10

In the Moving to Opportunity study, only some groups of children who were moved to lower-poverty neighborhoods benefited, because the increase in well-being was

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler