位置1的问题 Negotiated settlements are often required because:All parties agree on objectives Ambiguous objectives create conflicting viewsOutside experts are hard to find Political influence in decision-making

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When approaching the question about why negotiated settlements are often required, it helps to evaluate what each option implies about the decision environment.
Option 1: 'All parties agree on objectives' suggests a harmonious starting point. If objectives are already fully aligned, there is less need for negotiation, because consensus reduces conflict. This makes the option unlikely as a general reason for negotiated settlements.
Option 2: 'Ambiguous objectives create conflicting views' points to a core source of bargaining trouble. If objectives are unclear or open to interpretation, different parties may pursue incompatible goals, prompting negotiation to clarify aims and find a workable compromise. This aligns with why settlements are often necessary in practice.
Option 3: 'Outside experts are hard to find' speaks to practical constraints in decision processes. While access to expertise can affect how settlements are formed, the difficulty of finding experts is not typically cited as the primary driver for the need to negotiate settlements, making this option less central.
Option 4: 'Political influence in decision-making' highlights power dynamics rather than the fundamental need for settlement. While influence can shape outcomes, negotiated settlements arise more directly from disagreements over objectives and outcomes rather than from influence alone, making this explanation incomplete as a general reason.

In summary, the core driver among the options is the presence of ambiguous objectives leading to conflicting views, which necessitates negotiation to align purposes and reach an agreement. The other options describe related but less fundamental factors that do not directly explain why settlements are frequently required in this context.

位置1的问题 Negotiated settlements are often required because:All parties agree on objectives Ambiguous objectives create conflicting viewsOutside experts are hard to find Political influence in decision-making

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

How is compromise different from an integrative solution?

Question at position 5 When there is intense and animated discussion, one of the greatest challenges for both sides at the negotiating table is to recognize that it is not personal.TrueFalse

Hana is in a negotiation where the main objective is to find a mutually beneficial solution that addresses the needs and interests of all parties involved, creating value beyond the immediate issue at hand. What type of negotiation is Hana engaged in?

Question at position 24 Through collaborative negotiations both side work together to maximize the outcome or create a win-win resultTrueFalse

Question at position 5 Companies have full control over their policies as they do not have to Question Blank 1 of 1[input] with customers.

What is interaction between two sets of individuals, groups or nations to settle disagreements through compromises and concessions?

Which of the following is a positive for having negotiations at our place?

In which of the following situations does negotiation tend to be used?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler