Which of the following is a “don’t” of distributive negotiations?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Which of the following is a “don’t” of distributive negotiations?

Option 1: Don’t overshoot
- This choice aligns with a conservative approach in distributive bargaining, where overreaching beyond what you can reasonably justify can provoke a breakdown in negotiations or provoke the other party to walk away. The reasoning here is that overshooting your own needs or exposing an overly aggressive demand typically reduces the chance of reaching any settlement.

Option 2: Don’t set a strong first offer
- In distributive negotiation theory, making a strong first offer is often recommended because it can anchor the negotiation in your favor and establish a favorable reference point. Therefore, advising not to set a strong first offer would be counterintuitive to effective tactics, making this option incorrect as a general don’t.

Option 3: Don’t exploit what you learn about the other side
- Exploiting information learned about the other side is a common and acceptable tactic in distributive bargaining, as it helps to shape concessions and leverage. Labeling this as a don’t would be inaccurate, since strategically using information is typically encouraged.

Option 4: Don’t jeopardize your relationship with your counter part
- In many distributive contexts, the relationship is not the primary focus; the emphasis is on the deal terms and concessions. While professional conduct matters, the core learning of distributive don’t-s often targets not sacrificing one’s own bottom line. Therefore, while preserving a working relationship is valuable, it is not universally framed as a strict don’t in the classic distributive framework, making this option less aligned with the typical don’ts compared to overshooting.

Overall, the option identified as a don’t that fits the standard guidance for distributive negotiations is that you should avoid overshooting. The other options either contradict common distributive tactics (where strong first offers are recommended, or information about the other party can be used) or address relationship concerns that are not the central don’t in the classic sense. Keep in mind that practical negotiation training often emphasizes anchoring with a strong first offer and using knowledge about the other side, rather than avoiding these moves altogether.

ace_221_120251_246792 Quiz 1

Which of the following is a “don’t” of distributive negotiations?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In your negotiations with an important customer, you realize that the two of you are focused on a single issue –price. What strategies could you employ to give this negotiation a more integrative focus?

Which situation is best suited for cooperative negotiation?

Under a competitive negotiation orientation, the buyer views the negotiation as:

The two negotiation strategies discussed in the textbook are: distributive and integrative.

Which negotiation process uses an interests-based approach and aims for mutually beneficial outcomes?

Which statement below is WRONG regarding what you should do when you negotiate for a better job offer with the company you very much want to join (while you have offers from other companies as well)?

The two fundamental bargaining/negotiation strategies are:

A type of negotiation strategy in which both parties are able to achieve an outcome that is satisfying and useful.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler