Adult peppered moths (Biston betularia) come in a range of shades, ranging from light grey to dark black. Analysis has shown that the color of the moth is determined by genetics. In the age of industrialization, tree trunks were darkened as a result of pollution. It was observed that light-colored moths decreased in these polluted areas while the dark-colored moths increased. This is an example of natural selection .

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This question presents a statement about peppered moths and asks us to evaluate it in light of natural selection.
First, the scenario: industrial pollution darkened tree trunks, and moths come in light and dark variants with a genetic basis. In polluted areas, the darker moths survive at higher rates because their coloration provides better camouflage against darkened backgrounds, while lighter moths are more visible to predators and die at higher rates. Over generations, this differential survival and reproduction changes the frequency of alleles associated with coloration.
In terms of natural selection, the key components are variation in a trait (color morphs), differential survival due to environmental conditions (dark trunks favor dark moths, light trunks favor light moths), and a genetic basis for the trait that can be passed to offspring. The peppered moth example perfectly illustrates directional selection, a form of natural selection, where one extreme (dark color in polluted areas) becomes more common.
Because the statement recognizes that the color is genetically determined and that environmental change (industrial soot darkening trees) shifts survival success, it aligns with the core concept of natural selection. The explanation does not rely on random chance alone, nor does it attribute the pattern to non-evolutionary processes.
If we were to contrast with potential misconceptions: an idea that selection would never shift if colors were genetic would be incorrect; selection acts on existing variation, and genetic basis allows the favored trait to increase in frequency. Another misconception would be attributing the change to genetic drift alone; drift is random and less likely to produce a predictable pattern tied to environmental change.
Overall, the statement is consistent with natural selection because it ties heritable variation to differential survival in response to a changing environment, leading to shifts in allele frequencies and phenotype frequencies over generations.

BIOL_1105_60452_202506 Lesson 21 Homework

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A doctor in Ithaca discovers that 4 generations of a family have black bones. Black bones are similar to white bones in every way except in color. Do we expect a change in the frequency of the black bone phenotype due to evolution by natural selection?

Which (if any) of the following are the assertions for evolution by natural selection?

According to evolutionary theory, how did giraffes develop their long necks?

Of the factors that can result in evolution within a population (microevolution), the only one that is likely to lead to adaptive change is

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler