Regarding the American Indian legend of the world resting on the back of a turtle, Burkhart would probably agree that "what does the turtle stand on?" is a good question to ask about it.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a true/false statement: 'Regarding the American Indian legend of the world resting on the back of a turtle, Burkhart would probably agree that "what does the turtle stand on?" is a good question to ask about it.'

Option True: This option asserts that Burkhart would agree that the question about what the turtle stands on is good. A student evaluating this should consider Burkhart’s likely analytic frame. If Burkhart emphasizes myth as a symbolic or cultural narrative rather than a literal physical story, he might argue that asking about the turtle’s foundation is less productive than probing what the myth means for worldview, cosmology, or social values. Therefore, labeling the question as definitively good could misrepresent a more nuanced scholarly stance, making this option questionable or incorrect.

Option False: This is the statement identified as correct by the source. Explaining why, one can argue that Burkhart would likely caution against taking mythic details at face value or treating them as physical facts. He would emphasize the interpretive layer—what the image of the world on a turtle signifies about creation, balance, or cultural meaning—and he might view a question about what the turtle stands on as potentially missing the point of the myth. Thus, the claim that it is a good question to ask about the legend would not align with a critical or interpretive approach, supporting why this option is true to the given answer.

In assessing the options, consider how the question might be used in scholarly discussion: a literal inquiry about the turtle’s support could distract from symbolic interpretation, whereas a focus on meaning, function, and context would be more consistent with Burkhart’s likely methodology. The contrast between seeking literal versus interpretive understanding helps justify why the false statement aligns with the expected scholarly position.

Summary of incorrect reasoning for Option True: it overemphasizes a literal infrastructure inquiry and underemphasizes interpretive analysis, which is typically central in Burkhart’s approach.

Summary of correct reasoning for Option False: it reflects a stance that Burkhart would prioritize symbolic and contextual interpretation over a literal question about what the turtle stands on, making the statement as a claim about his agreement unlikely to be true.

PHIL 220-001 Burkhart Quiz

Regarding the American Indian legend of the world resting on the back of a turtle, Burkhart would probably agree that "what does the turtle stand on?" is a good question to ask about it.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

When the term rationalize is used in Chapter Two with regards to myth, it is referring to the tendency....

In the myth of Raven, what is the underlying truth the myth is communicating?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler