[9.10-10-12] All of the following are artifacts associated with a mobile phone which might contain data of evidentiary value; address book, call history, SMS, MMS, e-mail, web browser history, photos, videos, music, documents, calendar, network communication, maps, social networking data, and deleted data.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a statement about artifacts on a mobile phone that might contain data of evidentiary value and lists a broad range of data types such as address book, call history, SMS, MMS, e-mail, web browser history, photos, videos, music, documents, calendar, network communication, maps, social networking data, and deleted data.

Consider the breadth of data typically stored or accessible on modern mobile devices: contact information (address book), historical records of calls (call history), text and multimedia messages (SMS and MMS), electronic messages (e-mail), traces left by web browsers (history), personal media (photos, videos, music), documents stored locally, calendar items, network activity metadata, location and navigation data from maps, social media data accessed via apps, and importantly, data that may have been deleted but can often be recovered with forensic techniques. Each category represents data that could reasonably be used as evidence in investigations or legal proceedings.

Option analysis: 
- The statement asserts that all these artifacts might contain data of evidentiary value. This is broadly accurate because forensic practitioners routinely examine mobile devices for a wide range of data artifacts to reconstruct events, user behavior, and timelines. 
- It is also worth noting practical considerations: some data may be encrypted, cleared, or overwritten, depending on device settings, app behavior, and user actions. While not every artifact will always be recoverable, the potential for evidentiary value exists across the listed data types. 
- The inclusion of deleted data is important: deleted information can often be recovered using specialized forensic tools, making it a legitimate source of evidentiary data even after deletion attempts.

In summary, the statement correctly identifies a comprehensive set of data artifacts from a mobile phone that may hold evidentiary value, and it reflects common forensic perspectives on mobile device evidence.

EN.650.667.01.SP25 测验 - 第 1 章

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

[9.2-9.6] Which of the following tasks should be considered when handling an Android device to enable greater access for analysis? (Select all that apply)

[6.7] How can forensic examiners use the Android emulator in relation to adb commands?

[3.8] When connecting an Android device to a workstation, why might write protection prevent the successful acquisition of a device?

[3.5] For an Android, which of the following files are of interest for a forensic examiner?

[1.8] What are the major categories of the mobile forensics process?

[12.5] 下列哪项内容应包含在移动设备法医检查报告中？（选择所有适用的选项。）

[12.4] A report of the forensic examination of a mobile device should include details about the important actions performed by the examiner, results of the acquisition, and any inferences drawn from the results.

[11.11] When recovering raw data or files from a mobile phone, it is advisable to immediately create a read-only master copy and duplicate it.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler