In the cat predation study, the majority of owners provided data on the majority of days, but the number of observation days varied. The average number of prey per day was calculated for each cat, so this will be based on a different number of days for different cats.

Considering this information, which of the following is true? (Tick as many as apply.)

Question

In the cat predation study, the majority of owners provided data on the majority of days, but the number of observation days varied.  The average number of prey per day was calculated for each cat, so this will be based on a different number of days for different cats.

Considering this information, which of the following is true?  (Tick as many as apply.)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question describes a cat predation study where data were collected on the majority of days for each cat, but the number of observation days varied across cats. The average prey per day is calculated for each cat, which means each cat’s daily average is based on a different number of days. With this context, evaluate each statement in turn.

Option 1: 'Missing data occurs in a very large number of studies; it can be safely ignored.' This is a misleading stance. Missing data are common, but ignoring them can introduce bias or reduce the validity of conclusions, especially if the mechanism of missingness is related to the outcome or differs between groups. We should consider how missingness might affect estimates rather than dismiss it as safe to ignore.

Option 2: 'If the missing data are in both groups, the conclusions for the study can be considered reliable.' While having data missing in both comparison groups might mitigate some concerns, it does not guarantee reliability. The pattern and mechanism of missingness (for example, whether missing days relate to cats behaving atypically on those days) can still bias the estimated effect. Simply having missing data in both groups does not automatically ensure trustworthy conclusions.

Option 3: 'To rely on the conclusions of the study, we need to assume that cat behaviour on days when data are missing is no different from days when data are recorded.' This captures a key assumption often required for valid inference when data are missing: that the missingness is missing at random with respect to the outcome, or that the behavior on missing days would be similar to observed days. If this assumption is violated, estimates like the average prey per day per cat may be biased. Therefore, recognizing and evaluating this assumption is essential for interpreting the results.

Option 4: 'Interviewing cat owners to understand why some of the data are missing would be helpful.' This is a practical, methodological step to assess the missing data mechanism. Gaining insights into why data are missing can inform whether the missingness is random or related to observations (for example, owners skipping days with unusual behavior), and can guide remedies such as sensitivity analyses or data imputation strategies. This approach strengthens the study’s interpretability.

In summary, options 3 and 4 correctly address essential considerations for handling missing data in this study context, by identifying the key assumption about missingness and proposing an investigative step to understand the data gaps. Options 1 and 2 either mischaracterize missing data handling or rely on a blanket assumption that may not safeguard against bias, making them less appropriate as true statements about the situation.

MAST90007_2025_WIN 2025 Quiz 2

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What is NOT a recommended practice for handling missing data during EDA?

Which step is essential in handling missing data?

Creating a dummy variable to indicate a missing predictor value is a valid way to handle missing values

In our course, if I don't have any information about a specific Marin Factor I should assign a value of:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler