Questions
PMGT5895 (all) Contracts Management Quiz
Single choice
A retailer describes a table as "solid oak" when it's actually oak veneer over particleboard. The customer buys it specifically wanting solid wood. Which factor would MOST likely defeat a misrepresentation claim?
Options
A.The customer noticed exposed particleboard before purchasing
B.The retailer genuinely believed it was solid oak
C.The statement was made after a non-refundable deposit was paid
D.The statement was opinion rather than fact
View Explanation
Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
We start by restating what’s being asked: a retailer labels a table as 'solid oak' when it’s actually oak veneer over particleboard, and the buyer purchased it specifically expecting solid wood. We evaluate each option to see which factor would most likely defeat a misrepresentation claim.
Option 1: The customer noticed exposed particleboard before purchasing. This is a strong factor against misrepresentation: if the buyer already observed the particleboard or th......Login to view full explanationLog in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
Jennifer has offered to sell her laptop computer for $750 to Jack. She tells Jack that the computer is only six months old but, in fact, it is three years old, and Jennifer wants to get rid of it. Jack agrees to buy the computer based on Jennifer's representations. This contract is:
Belle offers to supply a drink called ACV to Gibson's healthcare store. Belle claims and presents documentation to show that ACV has proven to reduce the risk of cancer. Based solely on the claims and documentation Belle provides, Gibson enters the contract. After Gibson receives the order, he discovers that the information Belle provided is false. Which of the following statements is true:
In selling a 600-acre farm to Family Farms, Inc., Jake tells the buyer that the land "will be worth twice as much by next year." This statement is not likely to support rescission of the contract because it is
Steve sells Bruno a car. After they agreed on the deal, but before the money was handed over, Bruno asks Steve is the car has any oil leaks, Steve says it does not. The car did have leaks and Bruno wants to sue Steve. Which one of the following cases would best apply to this situation:
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!